Skip to main content
SG110CX-P2-CN vs Sunny Tripower CORE2 STP 110-60 12 of 20 identical Swap Change inverters

Sungrow SG110CX-P2-CN vs SMA Solar Sunny Tripower CORE2 STP 110-60

Sungrow SG110CX-P2-CN
Sungrow
SG110CX-P2-CN
110 kW Grid-tie
VS
SMA Solar Sunny Tripower CORE2 STP 110-60
SMA Solar
Sunny Tripower CORE2 STP 110-60
110 kW 98.4 % euro Grid-tie
The verdict

SG110CX-P2-CN leads on the differences that matter

The largest is mpp trackers: 3 trackers more. 12 of 20 comparable parameters are identical, with 12 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.

See all 8 differences
How alike are they
12 of 20 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

8 of 20 parameters
Parameter SG110CX-P2-CN Sunny Tripower CORE2 STP 110-60 Difference
MPP trackers 9 12 3 trackers more
Max input current per tracker 30.0 A 26.0 A 4.0 A more headroom
Max AC power 121.00 kW 110.00 kW 11.00 kW apart
Weight 82.0 kg 93.5 kg 11.5 kg lighter
Max AC current 183.3 A 158.8 A 24.5 A apart
Start voltage 200 V 250 V 50 V earlier start
MPPT voltage range 180-1000 V 200-1000 V 180-1000 V vs 200-1000 V
Dimensions 795x1020x360 mm 682x1117x363 mm 795x1020x360 mm vs 682x1117x363 mm
02

Full specification

Parameter SG110CX-P2-CN Sunny Tripower CORE2 STP 110-60 Difference
AC output
Rated AC power 110.00 kW 110.00 kW Same
Max AC power 121.00 kW 110.00 kW 11.00 kW apart
Grid connection 3-phase 3-phase Same
Nominal AC voltage 400 V 400 V Same
Max AC current 183.3 A 158.8 A 24.5 A apart
PV input
Max PV power - 165.00 kW Not published by Sungrow
DC/AC ratio - 1.50 Not published by Sungrow
Max DC voltage 1100 V 1100 V Same
MPPT voltage range 180-1000 V 200-1000 V 180-1000 V vs 200-1000 V
Start voltage 200 V 250 V -50 V for SG110CX-P2-CN
MPP trackers 9 12 +3 trackers for Sunny Tripower CORE2 STP 110-60
Strings per tracker 2 2 Same
Max input current per tracker 30.0 A 26.0 A +4.0 A for SG110CX-P2-CN
Efficiency
European efficiency - 98.4 % Not published by Sungrow
Max efficiency 98.6 % 98.6 % Same
CEC efficiency - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery
Battery input - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery voltage - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Max charge current - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Backup power - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Physical
Weight 82.0 kg 93.5 kg -11.5 kg for SG110CX-P2-CN
Weight per kW 0.7 kg/kW 0.8 kg/kW Effectively the same
Dimensions 795x1020x360 mm 682x1117x363 mm 795x1020x360 mm vs 682x1117x363 mm
Ingress protection IP66 IP66 Same
Cooling forced-air forced-air Same
Noise - 78 dB Not published by Sungrow
Max operating temperature 60 °C 60 °C Same
Connectivity and safety
Wi-Fi - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Ethernet - Yes Not published by Sungrow
Arc fault protection Yes Yes Same
Integrated DC switch Yes Yes Same
Warranty
Warranty - 5 yrs Not published by Sungrow
03

More useful comparisons

Open all inverters
Same type, similar size
Ginlong Solis
Sungrow SG110CX-P2-CN vs Ginlong Solis S5-GC110K
6 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
Same type, similar size
Ginlong Solis
Sungrow SG110CX-P2-CN vs Solis-110K-HV-5G
4 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
Same type, similar size
Growatt
Sungrow SG110CX-P2-CN vs Growatt MAX 110KTL3-X LV
5 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
Same type, similar size
Sofar Solar
SMA Solar Sunny Tripower CORE2 STP 110-60 vs SOFAR 125KTLX-G4
8 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
04

Written summary

Checking cache...

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate.