SOFAR 10KTLM-G3 vs Sungrow SG10KTL-M
VS
The verdict
12 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is european efficiency: 0.8 pp more efficient. 8 of 20 comparable parameters are identical, with 12 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 12 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 20 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
12 of 20 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
SOFAR 10KTLM-G3
SG10KTL-M
Difference
European efficiency
97.3 %
98.1 %
0.8 pp more efficient
Max DC voltage
600 V
1100 V
500 V apart
Max input current per tracker
20.0 A
11.0 A
9.0 A more headroom
Max efficiency
98.1 %
98.6 %
0.5 pp more efficient
Weight
18.5 kg
20.0 kg
1.5 kg lighter
Grid connection
Single-phase
3-phase
Single-phase vs 3-phase
Nominal AC voltage
230 V
400 V
170 V apart
Max AC current
46.0 A
16.5 A
29.5 A apart
Start voltage
90 V
250 V
160 V earlier start
MPP trackers
3
2
1 tracker more
MPPT voltage range
80-550 V
200-1000 V
80-550 V vs 200-1000 V
Dimensions
380x468x187 mm
485x370x160 mm
380x468x187 mm vs 485x370x160 mm
02
Full specification
Parameter
SOFAR 10KTLM-G3
SG10KTL-M
Difference
AC output
Rated AC power
10.00 kW
10.00 kW
Same
Max AC power
10.00 kW
10.00 kW
Same
Grid connection
Single-phase
3-phase
Single-phase vs 3-phase
Nominal AC voltage
230 V
400 V
170 V apart
Max AC current
46.0 A
16.5 A
29.5 A apart
PV input
Max PV power
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
DC/AC ratio
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Max DC voltage
600 V
1100 V
500 V apart
MPPT voltage range
80-550 V
200-1000 V
80-550 V vs 200-1000 V
Start voltage
90 V
250 V
-160 V for SOFAR 10KTLM-G3
MPP trackers
3
2
+1 trackers for SOFAR 10KTLM-G3
Strings per tracker
1
1
Same
Max input current per tracker
20.0 A
11.0 A
+9.0 A for SOFAR 10KTLM-G3
Efficiency
European efficiency
97.3 %
98.1 %
+0.8 pp for SG10KTL-M
Max efficiency
98.1 %
98.6 %
+0.5 pp for SG10KTL-M
CEC efficiency
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery
Battery input
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery voltage
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Max charge current
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Backup power
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Physical
Weight
18.5 kg
20.0 kg
-1.5 kg for SOFAR 10KTLM-G3
Weight per kW
1.9 kg/kW
2.0 kg/kW
Effectively the same
Dimensions
380x468x187 mm
485x370x160 mm
380x468x187 mm vs 485x370x160 mm
Ingress protection
IP65
IP65
Same
Cooling
natural
natural
Same
Noise
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Max operating temperature
60 °C
60 °C
Same
Connectivity and safety
Wi-Fi
Yes
-
Not published by Sungrow
Ethernet
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Arc fault protection
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Integrated DC switch
Yes
Yes
Same
Warranty
Warranty
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
03
Open all inverters
More useful comparisons
Same type, similar size
Growatt
SOFAR 10KTLM-G3 vs Growatt MOD 10KTL3-X2(Pro)
13 differences, the largest is european efficiency
Same type, similar size
Growatt
SOFAR 10KTLM-G3 vs Growatt MOD 10KTL3-X
15 differences, the largest is european efficiency
Same type, similar size
Sungrow
SOFAR 10KTLM-G3 vs Sungrow SG10RT-20
13 differences, the largest is european efficiency
Same type, similar size
Sofar Solar
Sungrow SG10KTL-M vs SOFAR 11KTLX-G3
7 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
04
Written summary
Checking cache...
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate.
