Sofar Solar ESI-10K-T1 vs Huawei SUN2000-10KTL-M1
VS
The verdict
14 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is european efficiency: 0.6 pp more efficient. 12 of 26 comparable parameters are identical, with 6 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
12
of 26 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
14 of 26 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
ESI-10K-T1
SUN2000-10KTL-M1
Difference
European efficiency
97.5 %
98.1 %
0.6 pp more efficient
Max DC voltage
1000 V
1100 V
100 V apart
Max input current per tracker
20.0 A
11.0 A
9.0 A more headroom
Max PV power
20.00 kW
15.00 kW
5.00 kW apart
DC/AC ratio
2.00
1.50
0.50 more oversizing headroom
Max charge current
25 A
16 A
9 A faster charging
Weight
30.0 kg
17.0 kg
13.0 kg lighter
Weight per kW
3.0 kg/kW
1.7 kg/kW
1.3 kg/kW lighter
Max efficiency
98.2 %
98.6 %
0.4 pp more efficient
MPP trackers
3
2
1 tracker more
Ingress protection
IP66
IP65
IP66 vs IP65
MPPT voltage range
160-950 V
140-980 V
160-950 V vs 140-980 V
Battery voltage
350-435 Vdc
600 V ~ 980 V
350-435 Vdc vs 600 V ~ 980 V
Dimensions
440x708x170 mm
525x470x146 mm
440x708x170 mm vs 525x470x146 mm
02
Full specification
Parameter
ESI-10K-T1
SUN2000-10KTL-M1
Difference
AC output
Rated AC power
10.00 kW
10.00 kW
Same
Max AC power
11.00 kW
11.00 kW
Same
Grid connection
3-phase
3-phase
Same
Nominal AC voltage
400 V
400 V
Same
Max AC current
16.7 A
16.9 A
Effectively the same
PV input
Max PV power
20.00 kW
15.00 kW
5.00 kW apart
DC/AC ratio
2.00
1.50
+0.50 for ESI-10K-T1
Max DC voltage
1000 V
1100 V
100 V apart
MPPT voltage range
160-950 V
140-980 V
160-950 V vs 140-980 V
Start voltage
200 V
200 V
Same
MPP trackers
3
2
+1 trackers for ESI-10K-T1
Strings per tracker
1
1
Same
Max input current per tracker
20.0 A
11.0 A
+9.0 A for ESI-10K-T1
Efficiency
European efficiency
97.5 %
98.1 %
+0.6 pp for SUN2000-10KTL-M1
Max efficiency
98.2 %
98.6 %
+0.4 pp for SUN2000-10KTL-M1
CEC efficiency
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery
Battery input
Yes
Yes
Same
Battery voltage
350-435 Vdc
600 V ~ 980 V
350-435 Vdc vs 600 V ~ 980 V
Max charge current
25 A
16 A
+9 A for ESI-10K-T1
Backup power
-
3.3 kW
Not published by Sofar Solar
Physical
Weight
30.0 kg
17.0 kg
-13.0 kg for SUN2000-10KTL-M1
Weight per kW
3.0 kg/kW
1.7 kg/kW
-1.3 kg/kW for SUN2000-10KTL-M1
Dimensions
440x708x170 mm
525x470x146 mm
440x708x170 mm vs 525x470x146 mm
Ingress protection
IP66
IP65
IP66 vs IP65
Cooling
natural
natural
Same
Noise
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Max operating temperature
60 °C
60 °C
Same
Connectivity and safety
Wi-Fi
-
Yes
Not published by Sofar Solar
Ethernet
-
Yes
Not published by Sofar Solar
Arc fault protection
Yes
Yes
Same
Integrated DC switch
Yes
Yes
Same
Warranty
Warranty
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
03
Open all inverters
More useful comparisons
Same type, similar size
SolarEdge
Sofar Solar ESI-10K-T1 vs SolarEdge SE10000H
11 differences, the largest is european efficiency
Same type, similar size
Growatt
Sofar Solar ESI-10K-T1 vs Growatt MOD 10KTL3-XH
11 differences, the largest is european efficiency
Same type, similar size
Growatt
Sofar Solar ESI-10K-T1 vs Growatt MOD 10KTL3-HU
9 differences, the largest is european efficiency
Same type, similar size
Huawei
Huawei SUN2000-10KTL-M1 vs Huawei SUN2000-10KTL-M1 (High current version)
2 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
04
Written summary
Checking cache...
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate.