Growatt WIT 20K-XHU vs Growatt MID 20KTL3-XH
VS
The verdict
MID 20KTL3-XH leads on the differences that matter
The largest is european efficiency: 1.3 pp more efficient. 12 of 25 comparable parameters are identical, with 7 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
12
of 25 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
13 of 25 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
WIT 20K-XHU
MID 20KTL3-XH
Difference
European efficiency
97.2 %
98.5 %
1.3 pp more efficient
Max DC voltage
1000 V
1100 V
100 V apart
Max input current per tracker
40.0 A
32.0 A
8.0 A more headroom
Max AC power
22.00 kW
20.00 kW
2.00 kW apart
Max charge current
55 A
25 A
30 A faster charging
Weight
45.0 kg
31.0 kg
14.0 kg lighter
Weight per kW
2.2 kg/kW
1.6 kg/kW
0.7 kg/kW lighter
Max efficiency
98.1 %
98.5 %
0.4 pp more efficient
Max AC current
66.7 A
33.3 A
33.4 A apart
MPPT voltage range
150-850 V
160-1000 V
150-850 V vs 160-1000 V
Start voltage
180 V
200 V
20 V earlier start
Battery voltage
120-800V
600-980 V
120-800V vs 600-980 V
Dimensions
456x684x240 mm
435x580x230 mm
456x684x240 mm vs 435x580x230 mm
02
Full specification
Parameter
WIT 20K-XHU
MID 20KTL3-XH
Difference
AC output
Rated AC power
20.00 kW
20.00 kW
Same
Max AC power
22.00 kW
20.00 kW
2.00 kW apart
Grid connection
3-phase
3-phase
Same
Nominal AC voltage
400 V
400 V
Same
Max AC current
66.7 A
33.3 A
33.4 A apart
PV input
Max PV power
40.00 kW
40.00 kW
Same
DC/AC ratio
2.00
2.00
Same
Max DC voltage
1000 V
1100 V
100 V apart
MPPT voltage range
150-850 V
160-1000 V
150-850 V vs 160-1000 V
Start voltage
180 V
200 V
-20 V for WIT 20K-XHU
MPP trackers
2
-
Not published by Growatt
Strings per tracker
2
2
Same
Max input current per tracker
40.0 A
32.0 A
+8.0 A for WIT 20K-XHU
Efficiency
European efficiency
97.2 %
98.5 %
+1.3 pp for MID 20KTL3-XH
Max efficiency
98.1 %
98.5 %
+0.4 pp for MID 20KTL3-XH
CEC efficiency
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery
Battery input
Yes
Yes
Same
Battery voltage
120-800V
600-980 V
120-800V vs 600-980 V
Max charge current
55 A
25 A
+30 A for WIT 20K-XHU
Backup power
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Physical
Weight
45.0 kg
31.0 kg
-14.0 kg for MID 20KTL3-XH
Weight per kW
2.2 kg/kW
1.6 kg/kW
-0.7 kg/kW for MID 20KTL3-XH
Dimensions
456x684x240 mm
435x580x230 mm
456x684x240 mm vs 435x580x230 mm
Ingress protection
IP66
IP66
Same
Cooling
forced-air
forced-air
Same
Noise
55 dB
-
Not published by Growatt
Max operating temperature
60 °C
60 °C
Same
Connectivity and safety
Wi-Fi
Yes
Yes
Same
Ethernet
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Arc fault protection
-
Yes
Not published by Growatt
Integrated DC switch
Yes
Yes
Same
Warranty
Warranty
-
5 yrs
Not published by Growatt
03
Open all inverters
More useful comparisons
Same type, similar size
Huawei
Growatt WIT 20K-XHU vs Huawei SUN2000-20K-MB0
14 differences, the largest is european efficiency
Same type, similar size
Fronius International
Growatt WIT 20K-XHU vs Fronius Verto 20.0 Plus
13 differences, the largest is european efficiency
Same type, similar size
Sofar Solar
Growatt WIT 20K-XHU vs Sofar Solar HYD 20KTL-3PH
13 differences, the largest is european efficiency
Same type, similar size
Sungrow
Growatt MID 20KTL3-XH vs Sungrow SH20T
13 differences, the largest is european efficiency
04
Written summary
Checking cache...
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate.

