GoodWe GW25K-MT vs Fronius Verto 25.0
VS

Fronius International
Fronius Verto 25.0
25 kW
97.4 % euro
Grid-tie
The verdict
GW25K-MT leads on the differences that matter
The largest is european efficiency: 1.0 pp more efficient. 9 of 20 comparable parameters are identical, with 12 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 20 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
11 of 20 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
GW25K-MT
Fronius Verto 25.0
Difference
European efficiency
98.4 %
97.4 %
1.0 pp more efficient
Max DC voltage
1100 V
1000 V
100 V apart
Max input current per tracker
30.0 A
28.0 A
2.0 A more headroom
Max efficiency
98.7 %
97.5 %
1.2 pp more efficient
Max AC power
27.50 kW
25.00 kW
2.50 kW apart
Weight
40.0 kg
41.8 kg
1.8 kg lighter
Max AC current
40.0 A
37.9 A
2.1 A apart
Start voltage
180 V
150 V
30 V earlier start
Ingress protection
IP65
IP66
IP65 vs IP66
MPPT voltage range
200-950 V
150-870 V
200-950 V vs 150-870 V
Dimensions
590x480x200 mm
865x574x279 mm
590x480x200 mm vs 865x574x279 mm
02
Full specification
Parameter
GW25K-MT
Fronius Verto 25.0
Difference
AC output
Rated AC power
25.00 kW
25.00 kW
Same
Max AC power
27.50 kW
25.00 kW
2.50 kW apart
Grid connection
3-phase
3-phase
Same
Nominal AC voltage
400 V
400 V
Same
Max AC current
40.0 A
37.9 A
2.1 A apart
PV input
Max PV power
-
37.50 kW
Not published by GoodWe
DC/AC ratio
-
1.50
Not published by GoodWe
Max DC voltage
1100 V
1000 V
100 V apart
MPPT voltage range
200-950 V
150-870 V
200-950 V vs 150-870 V
Start voltage
180 V
150 V
-30 V for Fronius Verto 25.0
MPP trackers
-
4
Not published by GoodWe
Strings per tracker
2
2
Same
Max input current per tracker
30.0 A
28.0 A
+2.0 A for GW25K-MT
Efficiency
European efficiency
98.4 %
97.4 %
+1.0 pp for GW25K-MT
Max efficiency
98.7 %
97.5 %
+1.2 pp for GW25K-MT
CEC efficiency
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery
Battery input
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery voltage
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Max charge current
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Backup power
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Physical
Weight
40.0 kg
41.8 kg
-1.8 kg for GW25K-MT
Weight per kW
1.6 kg/kW
1.7 kg/kW
Effectively the same
Dimensions
590x480x200 mm
865x574x279 mm
590x480x200 mm vs 865x574x279 mm
Ingress protection
IP65
IP66
IP65 vs IP66
Cooling
forced-air
forced-air
Same
Noise
-
56 dB
Not published by GoodWe
Max operating temperature
60 °C
60 °C
Same
Connectivity and safety
Wi-Fi
Yes
Yes
Same
Ethernet
-
Yes
Not published by GoodWe
Arc fault protection
-
Yes
Not published by GoodWe
Integrated DC switch
Yes
Yes
Same
Warranty
Warranty
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
03
Open all inverters
More useful comparisons
Same type, similar size
Growatt
GoodWe GW25K-MT vs Growatt MID 25KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
10 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
Same type, similar size
Growatt
GoodWe GW25K-MT vs Growatt MID 25KTL3-X
7 differences, the largest is weight
Same type, similar size
Growatt
GoodWe GW25K-MT vs Growatt MID 25KTL3-X1
9 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
04
Written summary
Checking cache...
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate.
