Ginlong Solis S6-EH3P50K-H vs GoodWe GW50K-ET-10
VS
The verdict
GW50K-ET-10 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is max input current per tracker: 2.0 A more headroom. 10 of 24 comparable parameters are identical, with 8 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
10
of 24 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
14 of 24 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
S6-EH3P50K-H
GW50K-ET-10
Difference
Max input current per tracker
40.0 A
42.0 A
2.0 A more headroom
European efficiency
97.4 %
97.8 %
0.4 pp more efficient
Max AC power
50.00 kW
55.00 kW
5.00 kW apart
Max PV power
96.00 kW
75.00 kW
21.00 kW apart
DC/AC ratio
1.92
1.50
0.42 more oversizing headroom
Max charge current
140 A
100 A
40 A faster charging
Weight
73.0 kg
65.0 kg
8.0 kg lighter
Max efficiency
97.8 %
98.1 %
0.3 pp more efficient
Nominal AC voltage
400 V
380 V
20 V apart
Max AC current
76.0 A
83.3 A
7.3 A apart
MPPT voltage range
150-850 V
165-850 V
150-850 V vs 165-850 V
Start voltage
180 V
160 V
20 V earlier start
Battery voltage
150-800 V
200-800 V
150-800 V vs 200-800 V
Dimensions
880x530x290 mm
660x520x260 mm
880x530x290 mm vs 660x520x260 mm
02
Full specification
Parameter
S6-EH3P50K-H
GW50K-ET-10
Difference
AC output
Rated AC power
50.00 kW
50.00 kW
Same
Max AC power
50.00 kW
55.00 kW
5.00 kW apart
Grid connection
3-phase
3-phase
Same
Nominal AC voltage
400 V
380 V
20 V apart
Max AC current
76.0 A
83.3 A
7.3 A apart
PV input
Max PV power
96.00 kW
75.00 kW
21.00 kW apart
DC/AC ratio
1.92
1.50
+0.42 for S6-EH3P50K-H
Max DC voltage
1000 V
1000 V
Same
MPPT voltage range
150-850 V
165-850 V
150-850 V vs 165-850 V
Start voltage
180 V
160 V
-20 V for GW50K-ET-10
MPP trackers
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Strings per tracker
2
2
Same
Max input current per tracker
40.0 A
42.0 A
+2.0 A for GW50K-ET-10
Efficiency
European efficiency
97.4 %
97.8 %
+0.4 pp for GW50K-ET-10
Max efficiency
97.8 %
98.1 %
+0.3 pp for GW50K-ET-10
CEC efficiency
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery
Battery input
Yes
Yes
Same
Battery voltage
150-800 V
200-800 V
150-800 V vs 200-800 V
Max charge current
140 A
100 A
+40 A for S6-EH3P50K-H
Backup power
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Physical
Weight
73.0 kg
65.0 kg
-8.0 kg for GW50K-ET-10
Weight per kW
1.5 kg/kW
1.3 kg/kW
Effectively the same
Dimensions
880x530x290 mm
660x520x260 mm
880x530x290 mm vs 660x520x260 mm
Ingress protection
IP66
IP66
Same
Cooling
forced-air
forced-air
Same
Noise
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Max operating temperature
60 °C
60 °C
Same
Connectivity and safety
Wi-Fi
-
Yes
Not published by Ginlong Solis
Ethernet
Yes
-
Not published by GoodWe
Arc fault protection
-
Yes
Not published by Ginlong Solis
Integrated DC switch
Yes
Yes
Same
Warranty
Warranty
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
03
Open all inverters
More useful comparisons
Same type, similar size
Growatt
Ginlong Solis S6-EH3P50K-H vs Growatt MID 50K-HU
11 differences, the largest is max efficiency
Same type, similar size
Deye
Ginlong Solis S6-EH3P50K-H vs Deye SUN-50K-SG01HP3-EU-BM4
12 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
Same type, similar size
Growatt
Ginlong Solis S6-EH3P50K-H vs Growatt WIT 50K-A-US / WIT 50K-AU-US
7 differences, the largest is weight
04
Written summary
Checking cache...
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate.

