Fronius Verto 30.0 vs Growatt MID 30KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)

Fronius International
Fronius Verto 30.0
29.99 kW
97.8 % euro
Grid-tie
VS
The verdict
MID 30KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) leads on the differences that matter
The largest is european efficiency: 0.8 pp more efficient. 11 of 22 comparable parameters are identical, with 10 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
11
of 22 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
11 of 22 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
Fronius Verto 30.0
MID 30KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Difference
European efficiency
97.8 %
98.6 %
0.8 pp more efficient
Max DC voltage
1000 V
1100 V
100 V apart
Max input current per tracker
28.0 A
40.0 A
12.0 A more headroom
Max efficiency
98.0 %
98.8 %
0.8 pp more efficient
Weight
41.8 kg
24.0 kg
17.8 kg lighter
Weight per kW
1.4 kg/kW
0.8 kg/kW
0.6 kg/kW lighter
Max AC current
45.5 A
50.5 A
5.0 A apart
Start voltage
150 V
200 V
50 V earlier start
MPP trackers
4
3
1 tracker more
MPPT voltage range
150-870 V
200-1000 V
150-870 V vs 200-1000 V
Dimensions
865x574x279 mm
415x528x225 mm
865x574x279 mm vs 415x528x225 mm
02
Full specification
Parameter
Fronius Verto 30.0
MID 30KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Difference
AC output
Rated AC power
29.99 kW
30.00 kW
Effectively the same
Max AC power
29.99 kW
30.00 kW
Effectively the same
Grid connection
3-phase
3-phase
Same
Nominal AC voltage
400 V
400 V
Same
Max AC current
45.5 A
50.5 A
5.0 A apart
PV input
Max PV power
45.00 kW
45.00 kW
Same
DC/AC ratio
1.50
1.50
Same
Max DC voltage
1000 V
1100 V
100 V apart
MPPT voltage range
150-870 V
200-1000 V
150-870 V vs 200-1000 V
Start voltage
150 V
200 V
-50 V for Fronius Verto 30.0
MPP trackers
4
3
+1 trackers for Fronius Verto 30.0
Strings per tracker
2
-
Not published by Growatt
Max input current per tracker
28.0 A
40.0 A
+12.0 A for MID 30KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Efficiency
European efficiency
97.8 %
98.6 %
+0.8 pp for MID 30KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Max efficiency
98.0 %
98.8 %
+0.8 pp for MID 30KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
CEC efficiency
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery
Battery input
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Battery voltage
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Max charge current
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Backup power
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Physical
Weight
41.8 kg
24.0 kg
-17.8 kg for MID 30KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Weight per kW
1.4 kg/kW
0.8 kg/kW
-0.6 kg/kW for MID 30KTL3-X2 (Pro.E)
Dimensions
865x574x279 mm
415x528x225 mm
865x574x279 mm vs 415x528x225 mm
Ingress protection
IP66
IP66
Same
Cooling
forced-air
forced-air
Same
Noise
56 dB
-
Not published by Growatt
Max operating temperature
60 °C
60 °C
Same
Connectivity and safety
Wi-Fi
Yes
Yes
Same
Ethernet
Yes
-
Not published by Growatt
Arc fault protection
Yes
-
Not published by Growatt
Integrated DC switch
Yes
Yes
Same
Warranty
Warranty
-
5 yrs
Not published by Fronius International
03
Open all inverters
More useful comparisons
Same type, similar size
SolarEdge
Fronius Verto 30.0 vs SolarEdge SE30K
11 differences, the largest is max pv power
Same type, similar size
Growatt
Fronius Verto 30.0 vs Growatt MID 30KTL3-X
11 differences, the largest is european efficiency
Same type, similar size
Growatt
Fronius Verto 30.0 vs Growatt MID 30KTL3-X2-1
9 differences, the largest is european efficiency
Same type, similar size
GoodWe
Growatt MID 30KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) vs GoodWe GW30K-MT
9 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
Same type, similar size
Huawei
Growatt MID 30KTL3-X2 (Pro.E) vs Huawei SUN2000-33KTL-A
11 differences, the largest is max input current per tracker
04
Written summary
Checking cache...
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate.
