ASM vs SpolarPV - solar panel manufacturer comparison
SpolarPV has the broader catalog (62 vs 1 models). SpolarPV leads on peak efficiency at 22.86%. SpolarPV leans bifacial (27% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) is a small Australian solar panel assembler that produces crystalline monocrystalline modules domestically using components sourced from Germany, Japan, the USA, and China. The company focuses on providing locally assembled PV modules tailored to Australian conditions, supporting...
- Founded
- 2009
- Headquarters
- Hallam, Victoria, Australia
- Employees
- 1-10
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
SpolarPV offers more 600W+ panels (18% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (48%)
The flagships
Written summary
ASM is a small, Australia-based panel assembler founded in 2009 in Victoria, which domestically assembles monocrystalline modules from imported cells and components sourced from Germany, Japan, the United States and China, rather than manufacturing cells in-house. It is not a BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankable supplier, and its operation is best described as a boutique, regionally focused assembler rather than a global-scale producer, with no disclosed multi-gigawatt annual output. SpolarPV Technology, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, established in 2010, with a disclosed annual production capacity of around 800 MW. SpolarPV also does not currently appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list, but its scale, vertically organized manufacturing, and broader international distribution give it a noticeably larger and more exportable industrial footprint than ASM, making it the stronger of the two in terms of institutional and manufacturing presence.
In terms of product focus, ASM's catalog historically centers on lower-wattage monocrystalline modules (roughly 170 W to 200 W models), aimed at small residential rooftops and niche domestic Australian installations, with TUV Rheinland and IEC 61215/61730 certification but no confirmed use of advanced cell technologies like TOPCon or HJT. SpolarPV's range is broader and more current, including monocrystalline PERC panels (such as 455 W and 585 W dual-glass bifacial modules) with efficiencies reported around 21 to 23 percent, positioning it for both residential rooftops and larger commercial installations, with glass-glass bifacial construction aimed at harsher-climate durability. Neither brand has confirmed HJT or large-scale TOPCon deployment in available sources.
For a typical buyer in 2025, SpolarPV is the more broadly viable default given its larger disclosed production scale, more modern panel wattages and efficiencies, and wider international market presence, while ASM may still appeal specifically to Australian buyers prioritizing locally assembled product with a traceable domestic supply chain. Neither manufacturer currently holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status, so buyers prioritizing bank financing or large utility-scale projects should weigh that limitation carefully regardless of which brand they choose.
Generated by Claude Sonnet 5 · 2026-10-07
Other brand comparisons
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.