Skip to main content

ASM vs IBC Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

ASM
Australia Founded 2009
Read the ASM review
VS
IBC Solar
Germany Founded 1982
Read the IBC Solar review
At a glance

IBC Solar has the broader catalog (33 vs 1 models). IBC Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.18%. IBC Solar leans bifacial (45% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
1 33
Highest power
170 Wp 720 Wp
Best efficiency
16.0% 23.2%
Average efficiency
16.0% 22.1%
Bifacial share
0% 45%
Average warranty
- 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
ASM

Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) is a small Australian solar panel assembler that produces crystalline monocrystalline modules domestically using components sourced from Germany, Japan, the USA, and China. The company focuses on providing locally assembled PV modules tailored to Australian conditions, supporting...

Founded
2009
Headquarters
Hallam, Victoria, Australia
Employees
1-10
IBC Solar

IBC Solar is a leading full-service provider of energy solutions and services in the field of photovoltaics and storage. The company offers complete photovoltaic systems and covers the entire product range from planning to the turnkey handover of photovoltaic systems. As a manufacturer-independent company, IBC SOLAR...

Founded
1982
Headquarters
Bad Staffelstein, Germany
Annual capacity
11+ GW/year
Employees
500
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric ASM IBC Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 1 33+32
Max Power 170 W 720 W+550 W
Avg Power 170 W 459 W+289 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 16.00% 23.18%+7.18 pp
Avg Efficiency 16.00% 22.14%+6.14 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.438%/°C -0.309%/°C+0.129
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 15 (45%)+45 pp
Avg Warranty - 30.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

IBC Solar skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

IBC Solar offers more 600W+ panels (9% of lineup)

ASM cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
IBC Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (39%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

ASM is a micro-scale Australian company founded in 2009 with a reported headcount of just 1-10 employees and no Tier 1 bankability designation. Its public panel portfolio contains no documented products, meaning no power ratings, efficiency figures, or warranty terms are available for independent scrutiny. IBC Solar, by contrast, is a long-established German firm founded in 1982 with roughly 500 employees and more than 11 GW of photovoltaic systems realized worldwide. It carries a listing on the NewConnect exchange and has a transparent, catalogued product range. On institutional footprint alone, IBC Solar is in an entirely different league.

IBC Solar's 33-panel portfolio averages 458.8 Wp per module, with a ceiling of 720 Wp, and average panel efficiency of 22.1% rising to a peak of 23.18%. The dominant cell architecture is TOPCon, accounting for about 39% of the lineup, with the remainder spanning complementary n-type variants. Roughly 45% of the portfolio is bifacial, a strong share that reflects a deliberate push toward both commercial rooftop and ground-mount applications. The average temperature coefficient sits at -0.31%/degree C, which is competitive for the technology tier, and the mean warranty term is 30 years - a generous figure that signals confidence in long-term yield stability. That combination of high wattage, respectable efficiency, and a bifacial-heavy catalog positions IBC Solar squarely for premium residential, commercial rooftop, and mid-scale ground-mount buyers who want bankable performance data behind their purchase.

For any typical buyer evaluating these two manufacturers in 2025, the comparison is effectively one-sided. IBC Solar offers a documented, technically competitive product range backed by four decades of operational history, a traceable capacity record of 11+ GW, and a warranty posture suited to project finance. ASM, with no public panel specifications and a workforce of under ten people, cannot be meaningfully evaluated on technical or financial-risk grounds. Unless a buyer has a specific regional or supply-chain reason to work with ASM directly, IBC Solar is the clear default choice on every measurable criterion.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
ASM A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar IBC Solar
Manufacturers
ASM AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO IBC Solar
Manufacturers
ASM AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar IBC Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 2 IBC Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.