Skip to main content

ASM vs FuturaSun - solar panel manufacturer comparison

ASM
Australia Founded 2009
Read the ASM review
VS
FuturaSun
Italy Founded 2008
Read the FuturaSun review
At a glance

FuturaSun has the broader catalog (36 vs 1 models). FuturaSun leads on peak efficiency at 23.18%. FuturaSun leans bifacial (36% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
1 36
Highest power
170 Wp 720 Wp
Best efficiency
16.0% 23.2%
Average efficiency
16.0% 21.6%
Bifacial share
0% 36%
Average warranty
- 27 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
ASM

Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) is a small Australian solar panel assembler that produces crystalline monocrystalline modules domestically using components sourced from Germany, Japan, the USA, and China. The company focuses on providing locally assembled PV modules tailored to Australian conditions, supporting...

Founded
2009
Headquarters
Hallam, Victoria, Australia
Employees
1-10
FuturaSun

FuturaSun is an Italian manufacturer of high-performance photovoltaic modules, founded in 2008 in Veneto, the heart of Italy's PV industry. The company distributes solar panels in more than 70 countries and operates production facilities in Taizhou, Asia, with a capacity of around 1 GW/year. FuturaSun is a privately...

Founded
2008
Headquarters
Cittadella, Italy
Annual capacity
1 GW/year
Employees
10-50
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric ASM FuturaSun
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 1 36+35
Max Power 170 W 720 W+550 W
Avg Power 170 W 472 W+302 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 16.00% 23.18%+7.18 pp
Avg Efficiency 16.00% 21.59%+5.59 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.438%/°C -0.308%/°C+0.130
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 13 (36%)+36 pp
Avg Warranty - 26.8 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

FuturaSun skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

FuturaSun offers more 600W+ panels (8% of lineup)

ASM cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
FuturaSun cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (50%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

ASM, trading as Australian Solar Manufacturing, is a small Victorian assembler founded in 2009 and based in Hallam, Australia. The company sources cells and components from Germany, Japan, the United States, and China, then assembles them domestically for the Australian market. No BloombergNEF Tier 1 listing was found for ASM, and no publicly disclosed production volume in the gigawatt range is available. FuturaSun, by contrast, is an Italian manufacturer founded in 2008 and headquartered in Cittadella, Veneto. It reports a module production capacity of around 500 MW per year, operates in more than 70 countries, and has secured EU Innovation Fund backing for a planned 1.4 GW module factory in Italy - with a separate 10 GW cell plant under development in China announced in 2023-2024. No confirmed BNEF Tier 1 entry was identified for FuturaSun in available sources either, but its multi-country project volume and institutional financing give it a considerably stronger global footprint than ASM.

ASM's catalog centers on legacy monocrystalline modules in the 170-200 Wp range, products consistent with small residential rooftop and light commercial installations, and its commercial reach is effectively limited to Australia. FuturaSun offers a broader and more current lineup anchored in n-type TOPCon cell technology. Its Silk Nova series stretches from standard residential formats to a 720 W glass-glass configuration, while the Silk Rhino variant targets harsh-climate deployments with class-5 hailstorm certification. A 390 W aesthetic panel released in April 2025 further extends the range into the building-integrated residential segment, positioning FuturaSun across residential, commercial, and light utility-scale use cases.

For most buyers in 2025, FuturaSun is the more defensible choice. Access to current n-type TOPCon technology, international distribution, and EU institutional backing represent a substantially more future-proof proposition than ASM's regionally constrained, lower-wattage lineup. ASM may still appeal to Australian buyers who prioritize domestic assembly, but the two brands are not meaningfully interchangeable on technical or commercial grounds.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-10

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
ASM A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar FuturaSun
Manufacturers
ASM AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO FuturaSun
Manufacturers
ASM AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar FuturaSun
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 7 FuturaSun offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.