ASM vs Dyness - solar panel manufacturer comparison
ASM has the broader catalog (1 vs 0 models).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) is a small Australian solar panel assembler that produces crystalline monocrystalline modules domestically using components sourced from Germany, Japan, the USA, and China. The company focuses on providing locally assembled PV modules tailored to Australian conditions, supporting...
- Founded
- 2009
- Headquarters
- Hallam, Victoria, Australia
- Employees
- 1-10
Dyness is a global innovator in energy storage solutions, specializing in battery system integration R&D and manufacturing. They provide lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery solutions for residential, commercial, and industrial applications. Dyness serves over 500,000 users in 100+ countries, partnering with 90+...
- Founded
- 2017
- Headquarters
- Suzhou, China
- Annual capacity
- 3+ GW/year
- Employees
- 200+
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
The flagships
Written summary
ASM, short for Australian Solar Manufacturing, is a small-scale panel assembler based in Australia that produces crystalline monocrystalline modules domestically, sourcing cells and components from Germany, Japan, the United States, and China. The company serves the local residential and light-commercial market and does not appear on BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability lists, which typically require gigawatt-scale annual production and a financing track record across multiple independent project lenders. Dyness, by contrast, is not a solar panel manufacturer - it is a battery energy storage system company founded in 2017 and headquartered in Suzhou, China, with manufacturing centers across Taizhou and Suzhou and a reported annual shipment capacity of around 3 GWh. Dyness won the EUPD Top Brand Storage award in 2025 and counts over 500,000 customers across more than 100 countries, giving it a substantially larger institutional footprint than ASM.
Because the two brands operate in different product categories - ASM in solar modules and Dyness in battery storage - a direct comparison is not straightforward. ASM's panels are assembled for Australian rooftop conditions, with a proposition built around local manufacturing and domestic support. Dyness focuses on lithium iron phosphate battery systems ranging from residential all-in-one units such as the Cygni and the PowerBox G2 to modular commercial-scale stacks like the Stack100 Pro, which scales from around 15 kWh to roughly 77 kWh per stack. Dyness products are designed to pair with solar installations from any panel brand rather than to compete with panel makers.
For a buyer seeking solar modules, ASM is the only relevant option of the two - though shoppers should be aware it is a niche local assembler, not a globally bankable manufacturer. For battery storage, Dyness is a credible mid-range choice, though it should be compared against larger rivals such as BYD and CATL before a final decision. These brands are better understood as covering different parts of the solar value chain than as direct competitors.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-12
Other brand comparisons
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.