Skip to main content

AEET vs S-Energy - solar panel manufacturer comparison

AEET
Headquarters not published
Read the AEET review
VS
S-Energy
South Korea Founded 2011
Read the S-Energy review
At a glance

S-Energy has the broader catalog (91 vs 5 models). S-Energy leads on peak efficiency at 22.38%. S-Energy leans bifacial (77% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
5 91
Highest power
200 Wp 665 Wp
Best efficiency
15.7% 22.4%
Average efficiency
14.9% 21.0%
Bifacial share
0% 77%
Average warranty
25 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
S-Energy
Founded
2011
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric AEET S-Energy
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 5 91+86
Max Power 200 W 665 W+465 W
Avg Power 190 W 512 W+322 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 15.70% 22.38%+6.68 pp
Avg Efficiency 14.90% 21.00%+6.10 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient - -0.339%/°C
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 70 (77%)+77 pp
Avg Warranty 25.0 yrs 27.7 yrs+2.7 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band
Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

S-Energy offers more 600W+ panels (12% of lineup)

AEET cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (100%)

S-Energy cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (59%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

AEET Energy Group GmbH is a German-based photovoltaic wholesale partner headquartered in Bad Gandersheim, Germany. Rather than operating as a vertically integrated panel manufacturer, AEET functions primarily as a distributor and system integrator, sourcing modules from world-leading producers and reselling them under its own brand while also providing planning, installation, and maintenance services through a network of more than 500 certified specialist partners across Germany. No BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability designation has been confirmed for AEET in publicly available sources. S-Energy, by contrast, is a South Korean manufacturer founded in 2001 as a spin-off from Samsung Electronics, with its main production facility in Daejeon, South Korea and sales offices in the United States, Chile, and Japan. S-Energy holds confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and operates a dedicated manufacturing base with an annual production capacity in the range of several hundred megawatts, giving it a substantially stronger institutional footprint with project financiers and EPC contractors.

S-Energy's best-known product family for the residential and light-commercial segment is the SN60 line, which uses half-cut monocrystalline silicon cells to reduce resistive losses and limit hot-spot risk. The line targets cost-conscious homeowners and small commercial rooftops, and independent reviewers note that S-Energy panels typically sell for noticeably less per watt than premium brands such as Maxeon or REC Solar, making them a recurring recommendation in value-focused comparisons. AEET's panel catalog, as listed on industry directories, skews toward older, lower-wattage crystalline silicon modules that appear better suited to legacy system replacements or price-driven projects in the European market; the company does not prominently publicize a current high-efficiency or bifacial product line in accessible public sources.

For a typical buyer in 2025 who needs a bankable, reasonably priced monocrystalline module with confirmed manufacturer credentials and an accessible warranty chain, S-Energy is the more defensible choice. Its Tier 1 status eases project financing, its Samsung lineage provides supply-chain credibility, and its value pricing makes it competitive even against larger Chinese producers. AEET's value lies more in its German distribution and service network than in panel technology or manufacturing scale, so it may be the right partner for European installers seeking local support rather than for buyers comparing module specifications directly.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-15

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
AEET A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar S-Energy
Manufacturers
AEET AIKO
Manufacturers
AKCOME S-Energy
Manufacturers
AEET ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM S-Energy
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.