A.B. Energy vs New East Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
New East Solar has the broader catalog (30 vs 0 models). New East Solar leans bifacial (67% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
ABO Energy is a renewable energy company that develops and constructs renewable energy projects, focusing on wind, solar, and storage facilities. They offer turnkey solutions and have connected several gigawatts of nominal output to the grid. The company is active internationally and is committed to driving the energy...
- Founded
- 1996
- Headquarters
- Wiesbaden, Germany
- Employees
- 1,400
New East Solar Energy (NE Solar) is a Cambodia-based solar cell and module manufacturer specializing in high-efficiency Mono and Poly PERC solar cells and modules. The company operates manufacturing facilities in Cambodia, Indonesia, and a new 2 GW factory in Phoenix, Arizona, USA. NE Solar holds a BNEF Tier 1...
- Headquarters
- Phnom Penh, Cambodia
- Annual capacity
- 5-10 GW/year
- Employees
- 201-500
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
New East Solar skews to higher efficiency: 7% of lineup is 23%+
New East Solar offers more 600W+ panels (33% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (67%)
The flagships
Written summary
New East Solar, operating as NE Solar under the legal name New East Solar Energy (Cambodia) Co., Ltd., is a Cambodian manufacturer headquartered in Phnom Penh. The company has expanded production across Cambodia, Indonesia, and the United States, where a 2-GW factory in Phoenix, Arizona was announced to bring its total nameplate capacity into the multi-gigawatt range. NE Solar holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankable status and also contract-manufactures modules for Chinese Tier 1 brand ZNShine, which points to a credible institutional footprint recognized by project-finance lenders. A.B. Energy, by contrast, does not appear in any Tier 1 lists, trade-press databases, or industry review platforms reviewed during research, which makes a symmetrical comparison impossible; NE Solar has the clearly stronger institutional standing of the two.
NE Solar's confirmed product focus is monocrystalline PERC technology, including bifacial modules, covering residential rooftops, commercial installations, and utility-scale ground-mount projects. Its Phoenix manufacturing presence is a notable differentiator for U.S. buyers seeking domestic-content eligibility under the Inflation Reduction Act. For A.B. Energy, no independently verified product family, cell technology, or use-case positioning could be confirmed from available sources; the brand has negligible English-language trade-press coverage and no documented large-project references.
For a typical buyer in 2025-2026 who prioritizes bankability and supply-chain transparency, NE Solar is the documentable choice between these two brands. Before considering A.B. Energy, any procurement team should request evidence of BNEF or equivalent bankability status, current IEC certification documents, and references from independently financed projects above 1 MW, since none of those data points emerged from public sources.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-09
Other brand comparisons
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.