Skip to main content
Home Tools Panel comparison calculator Report
30-year simulation report

A close run between five modules

TWMNF-66HD725 delivers 21,345 kWh over 30 years at 0.37 ¢/kWh, which makes its energy 4% cheaper per kilowatt-hour than the dearest module in this report. It is not the cheapest sticker price in the set - $66.78 is - and it still wins.

27 September 2026, 11:40 76882937-aba9 Saved - link stays live
Download PDF
Best long-term value
TWMNF-66HD725 725 Wp
  • Most energy produced. 21,345 kWh over 30 years.
  • Best composite in the set. It scores highest across lifetime energy, cost per kWh and warranty length taken together, even though it is not the cheapest energy in the set.
67 of 100
Cost per kWh 0.37 ¢/kWh
Ranking leader
TWMNF-66HD725
Score 67 of 100
Highest 30-year yield
21,345 kWh
2,797 kWh above the lowest module
Lowest cost per kWh
0.36 ¢/kWh
6% cheaper than the dearest
Modules compared
5
Prices entered by the requester
Assumptions Cell temperature25 °C InstallationPitched, equator Baseline yield1,050 kWh/kWp Horizon30 years CurrencyUSD Change and re-run
01

Side by side

# Manufacturer / model Power Price Year 1 30-year Cost per kWh Score
1 TWMNF-66HD725 725 Wp $78.30 754 21,345 0.37 ¢/kWh Most energy produced 67
2 Runda Solar RS725S9-132GANT 725 Wp $78.30 754 21,345 0.37 ¢/kWh Most energy produced 67
3 JAM66D45-650/LB 650 Wp $70.20 676 19,137 0.37 ¢/kWh 43
4 RSM132-11-605-630BNDG-630 630 Wp $66.78 655 18,548 0.36 ¢/kWh Cheapest energy in the set 41
5 LR7-72HYD-660M 660 Wp $74.58 686 19,571 0.38 ¢/kWh Weakest of the set 41
top 25% middle 50% bottom 25% Bands are relative to the modules in this report.

What drives each score

Each bar is the module's own composite, split into the three weighted parts that make it up. A dimension the whole set ties on separates nothing and splits evenly, and one they nearly tie on counts for nearly nothing.

TWMNF-66HD725 67
RS725S9-132GANT 67
JAM66D45-650/LB 43
RSM132-11-605-630BNDG-630 41
LR7-72HYD-660M 41
30-year yield · 45%Cost per kWh · 40%Warranty · 15%
02

Where the difference comes from

Cumulative energy

Kilowatt-hours added up year by year. The gap widens with every year - by year 30 it is 2,797 kWh between the highest and lowest module.

Power remaining

Percentage of nameplate power still delivered, on each module's own datasheet curve. A module that holds its power longer is producing from a bigger number every year.

03

Method

Full methodology
How each figure is built
1 Annual yield Panel watts times the installation baseline of 1,050 kWh/kWp, times a temperature factor from the module's own coefficient at 25 °C, times whatever degradation has left that year.
2 Degradation Each module ages at its own datasheet rate - TWMNF-66HD725 loses 1% in year one, then 0.4% a year. Where a manufacturer publishes no curve, the 2% / 0.55% convention is used.
3 Cost per kWh Offer price divided by the thirty annual yields added together. The only figure that lets a dearer module win, and often it does.
4 Score A 0-100 composite: lifetime energy 45%, cost per kWh 40%, warranty 15%, each normalised across this report's modules. A dimension they all tie on splits evenly.
What this does not model

Energy price inflation, inverter and installation cost, local irradiance and weather, shading, or degradation behaviour that differs from the datasheet curve. This report compares modules against each other, not a full system business case. Talk to an installer before you buy.

Sources
Panel specifications read from manufacturer datasheets, refreshed daily.
Prices entered by whoever generated this report - not quotes we obtained or verified.
Baseline yield from the installation type, overridable with PVGIS data.
Generated by ComparePV on 27 September 2026, 11:40 · report 76882937-aba9 · anonymous and shareable Run a new comparison