Skip to main content
Home Tools Panel comparison calculator Report
30-year simulation report

E720HCBG 132-T wins this comparison

E720HCBG 132-T delivers 18,432 kWh over 30 years at 92.23 p/kWh, which makes its energy 2% cheaper per kilowatt-hour than the dearest module in this report. It is not the cheapest sticker price in the set - ₹15,000 is - and it still wins.

14 September 2026, 12:10 62817bc7-5c8f Saved - link stays live
Download PDF
Best long-term value
Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T 720 Wp
  • Cheapest energy in the set. 92.23 p/kWh, 2% below the dearest module in the set.
  • Most energy produced. 18,432 kWh over 30 years, 2,572 kWh ahead of the next module.
  • Runs cooler under load. -0.29 %/°C against -0.34 %/°C, worth 1.5 points of output at 55 °C.
68 of 100
Cost per kWh 92.23 p/kWh
Ranking leader
E720HCBG 132-T
Score 68 of 100
Highest 30-year yield
18,432 kWh
2,572 kWh above the lowest module
Lowest cost per kWh
92.23 p/kWh
2% cheaper than the dearest
Modules compared
2
Prices entered by the requester
Assumptions Cell temperature55 °C InstallationFlat roof Baseline yield1,000 kWh/kWp Horizon30 years CurrencyINR Change and re-run
01

Side by side

# Manufacturer / model Power Price Year 1 30-year Cost per kWh Score
1 Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T 720 Wp ₹17,000 651 18,432 92.23 p/kWh Cheapest energy in the set 68
2 Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 650 Wp ₹15,000 572 15,860 94.58 p/kWh Loses more output when hot 32
top 25% middle 50% bottom 25% Bands are relative to the modules in this report.

What drives each score

Each bar is the module's own composite, split into the three weighted parts that make it up. A dimension the whole set ties on separates nothing and splits evenly, and one they nearly tie on counts for nearly nothing.

E720HCBG 132-T 68
ASM-M12-132-650 32
30-year yield · 45%Cost per kWh · 40%Warranty · 15%
02

Where the difference comes from

Cumulative energy

Kilowatt-hours added up year by year. The gap widens with every year - by year 30 it is 2,572 kWh between the highest and lowest module.

Power remaining

Percentage of nameplate power still delivered, on each module's own datasheet curve. A module that holds its power longer is producing from a bigger number every year.

03

Method

Full methodology
How each figure is built
1 Annual yield Panel watts times the installation baseline of 1,000 kWh/kWp, times a temperature factor from the module's own coefficient at 55 °C, times whatever degradation has left that year.
2 Degradation Each module ages at its own datasheet rate - E720HCBG 132-T loses 1% in year one, then 0.4% a year. Where a manufacturer publishes no curve, the 2% / 0.55% convention is used.
3 Cost per kWh Offer price divided by the thirty annual yields added together. The only figure that lets a dearer module win, and often it does.
4 Score A 0-100 composite: lifetime energy 45%, cost per kWh 40%, warranty 15%, each normalised across this report's modules. A dimension they all tie on splits evenly.
What this does not model

Energy price inflation, inverter and installation cost, local irradiance and weather, shading, or degradation behaviour that differs from the datasheet curve. This report compares modules against each other, not a full system business case. Talk to an installer before you buy.

Sources
Panel specifications read from manufacturer datasheets, refreshed daily.
Prices entered by whoever generated this report - not quotes we obtained or verified.
Baseline yield from the installation type, overridable with PVGIS data.
Generated by ComparePV on 14 September 2026, 12:10 · report 62817bc7-5c8f · anonymous and shareable Run a new comparison