Waaree BiN-08-560 vs Waaree BiH-11-725
VS
The verdict
BiH-11-725 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.67 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
6
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
13 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
BiN-08-560
BiH-11-725
Difference
Module efficiency
21.67 %
23.34 %
1.67 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.240 %/°C
0.060 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
560 Wp
725 Wp
165 W more power
Power density
216.7 Wp/m²
233.4 Wp/m²
16.7 Wp/m² higher
Weight
32.0 kg
39.0 kg
7.0 kg lighter
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.30 %/yr
0.10 %/yr slower
Short-circuit current
14.11 A
18.15 A
4.04 A apart
Module area
2.584 m²
3.106 m²
0.522 m² apart
Weight per kWp
57.1 kg/kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
3.3 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology
TOPCon
HJT
TOPCon vs HJT
Current at max power
13.34 A
17.10 A
3.76 A apart
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Dimensions
2279x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2279x1134x35 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
BiN-08-560
18,789 kWh
BiH-11-725
24,704 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,915 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
BiN-08-560
BiH-11-725
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
560 W
725 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
535 W
699 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
510 W
673 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
484 W
647 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
BiN-08-560
BiH-11-725
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
560 Wp
725 Wp
+165 W for BiH-11-725
Module efficiency
21.67 %
23.34 %
+1.67 pp for BiH-11-725
Power density
216.7 Wp/m²
233.4 Wp/m²
+16.7 Wp/m² for BiH-11-725
Open-circuit voltage
50.70 V
50.49 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
42.00 V
42.40 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
14.11 A
18.15 A
4.04 A apart
Current at max power
13.34 A
17.10 A
3.76 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.240 %/°C
+0.060 %/°C for BiH-11-725
Mechanical
Dimensions
2279x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2279x1134x35 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area
2.584 m²
3.106 m²
0.522 m² apart
Weight
32.0 kg
39.0 kg
-7.0 kg for BiN-08-560
Weight per kWp
57.1 kg/kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
-3.3 kg/kWp for BiH-11-725
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.30 %/yr
-0.10 %/yr for BiH-11-725
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
HJT
TOPCon vs HJT
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#7,588
vs
#943
BiH-11-725 leads by 6,645 places
Power density
#7,538
vs
#936
BiH-11-725 leads by 6,602 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#13
BiH-11-725 leads by 6,080 places
Weight
#11,052
vs
#7,866
BiH-11-725 leads by 3,186 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,105
vs
#412
BiH-11-725 leads by 5,693 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiN-08-560 vs Waaree BiN-08-555
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiN-08-560 vs Waaree BiN-08-550
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiN-08-560 vs Waaree BiN-08-545
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiH-11-730
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiH-11-720
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiH-11-715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Waaree BiN-08-560 or Waaree BiH-11-725?
According to our database: Waaree BiH-11-725 has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 21.67%); Waaree BiH-11-725 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Waaree BiN-08-560 and Waaree BiH-11-725?
Waaree BiN-08-560 has a module efficiency of 21.67%, while Waaree BiH-11-725 is 23.34%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Waaree BiN-08-560 use vs Waaree BiH-11-725?
Waaree BiN-08-560 uses TOPCon cells; Waaree BiH-11-725 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Waaree BiN-08-560 and Waaree BiH-11-725?
Waaree BiN-08-560 has a 30 years power warranty; Waaree BiH-11-725 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Waaree BiN-08-560 and Waaree BiH-11-725 bifacial panels?
Both Waaree BiN-08-560 and Waaree BiH-11-725 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 24 Waaree offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.