Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiN-08-555
VS
The verdict
BiH-11-725 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.86 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
6
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
13 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
BiH-11-725
BiN-08-555
Difference
Module efficiency
23.34 %
21.48 %
1.86 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
0.060 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
725 Wp
555 Wp
170 W more power
Power density
233.4 Wp/m²
214.8 Wp/m²
18.6 Wp/m² higher
Weight
39.0 kg
32.0 kg
7.0 kg lighter
Annual degradation
0.30 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.10 %/yr slower
Short-circuit current
18.15 A
14.05 A
4.10 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
2.584 m²
0.522 m² apart
Weight per kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
57.7 kg/kWp
3.9 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Current at max power
17.10 A
13.28 A
3.82 A apart
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2279x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2279x1134x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
BiH-11-725
24,704 kWh
BiN-08-555
18,621 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,083 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
BiH-11-725
BiN-08-555
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
725 W
555 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
699 W
530 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
673 W
505 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
647 W
480 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
BiH-11-725
BiN-08-555
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
725 Wp
555 Wp
+170 W for BiH-11-725
Module efficiency
23.34 %
21.48 %
+1.86 pp for BiH-11-725
Power density
233.4 Wp/m²
214.8 Wp/m²
+18.6 Wp/m² for BiH-11-725
Open-circuit voltage
50.49 V
50.50 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
42.40 V
41.80 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
18.15 A
14.05 A
4.10 A apart
Current at max power
17.10 A
13.28 A
3.82 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
+0.060 %/°C for BiH-11-725
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2279x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2279x1134x35 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
2.584 m²
0.522 m² apart
Weight
39.0 kg
32.0 kg
-7.0 kg for BiN-08-555
Weight per kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
57.7 kg/kWp
-3.9 kg/kWp for BiH-11-725
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.30 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.10 %/yr for BiH-11-725
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#943
vs
#8,152
BiH-11-725 leads by 7,209 places
Power density
#936
vs
#8,148
BiH-11-725 leads by 7,212 places
Heat behaviour
#13
vs
#6,093
BiH-11-725 leads by 6,080 places
Weight
#7,866
vs
#11,340
BiH-11-725 leads by 3,474 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#412
vs
#6,600
BiH-11-725 leads by 6,188 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiH-11-730
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiH-11-720
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiH-11-715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiH-11-710
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiH-11-705
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree BiH-11-725 vs Waaree BiH-11-700
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Waaree BiH-11-725 or Waaree BiN-08-555?
According to our database: Waaree BiH-11-725 has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 21.48%); Waaree BiH-11-725 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Waaree BiH-11-725 and Waaree BiN-08-555?
Waaree BiH-11-725 has a module efficiency of 23.34%, while Waaree BiN-08-555 is 21.48%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Waaree BiH-11-725 use vs Waaree BiN-08-555?
Waaree BiH-11-725 uses HJT cells; Waaree BiN-08-555 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Waaree BiH-11-725 and Waaree BiN-08-555?
Waaree BiH-11-725 has a 30 years power warranty; Waaree BiN-08-555 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Waaree BiH-11-725 and Waaree BiN-08-555 bifacial panels?
Both Waaree BiH-11-725 and Waaree BiN-08-555 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 24 Waaree offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.