Waaree Bi-66-585 vs Waaree Bi-68-665
VS
The verdict
68-665 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.77 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
10 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
66-585
68-665
Difference
Module efficiency
20.52 %
21.29 %
0.77 pp more efficient
Rated power
585 Wp
665 Wp
80 W more power
Weight
35.5 kg
39.0 kg
3.5 kg lighter
Power density
205.2 Wp/m²
212.8 Wp/m²
7.6 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage
41.76 V
46.58 V
4.82 V apart
Module area
2.851 m²
3.125 m²
0.273 m² apart
Cell count
120
132
12 cells apart
Voltage at max power
34.34 V
38.10 V
3.76 V apart
Weight per kWp
60.7 kg/kWp
58.6 kg/kWp
2.0 kg/kWp lighter
Dimensions
2190x1302x35 mm
2400x1302x35 mm
2190x1302x35 mm vs 2400x1302x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
66-585
18,959 kWh
68-665
21,552 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,593 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
66-585
68-665
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
585 W
665 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
555 W
631 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
525 W
597 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
495 W
563 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
66-585
68-665
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
585 Wp
665 Wp
+80 W for 68-665
Module efficiency
20.52 %
21.29 %
+0.77 pp for 68-665
Power density
205.2 Wp/m²
212.8 Wp/m²
+7.6 Wp/m² for 68-665
Open-circuit voltage
41.76 V
46.58 V
4.82 V apart
Voltage at max power
34.34 V
38.10 V
3.76 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.78 A
18.03 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.04 A
17.46 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2190x1302x35 mm
2400x1302x35 mm
2190x1302x35 mm vs 2400x1302x35 mm
Module area
2.851 m²
3.125 m²
0.273 m² apart
Weight
35.5 kg
39.0 kg
-3.5 kg for 66-585
Weight per kWp
60.7 kg/kWp
58.6 kg/kWp
-2.0 kg/kWp for 68-665
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.55 %/yr
0.55 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
PERC
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
120
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#11,244
vs
#8,708
68-665 leads by 2,536 places
Power density
#11,293
vs
#8,707
68-665 leads by 2,586 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778
vs
#8,778
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#12,517
vs
#11,826
68-665 leads by 691 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,692
vs
#2,941
68-665 leads by 3,751 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Waaree Bi-66-585 vs Waaree Bi-68-660
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Waaree Bi-66-585 vs Waaree Bi-68-655
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Waaree Bi-66-585 vs Waaree Bi-68-650
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Waaree Bi-66-585 vs Waaree Bi-68-645
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Waaree Bi-66-585 vs Waaree Bi-66-600
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Waaree Bi-66-585 vs Waaree Bi-66-595
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Waaree Bi-66-585 or Waaree Bi-68-665?
According to our database: Waaree Bi-68-665 has higher module efficiency (21.29% vs 20.52%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Waaree Bi-66-585 and Waaree Bi-68-665?
Waaree Bi-66-585 has a module efficiency of 20.52%, while Waaree Bi-68-665 is 21.29%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Waaree Bi-66-585 use vs Waaree Bi-68-665?
Waaree Bi-66-585 uses PERC cells; Waaree Bi-68-665 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Waaree Bi-66-585 and Waaree Bi-68-665?
Waaree Bi-66-585 has a 30 years power warranty; Waaree Bi-68-665 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Waaree Bi-66-585 and Waaree Bi-68-665 bifacial panels?
Both Waaree Bi-66-585 and Waaree Bi-68-665 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 24 Waaree offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.