Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05
VS
The verdict
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.96 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
10 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05
Difference
Module efficiency
23.66 %
22.70 %
0.96 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
0.040 %/°C better in heat
Power density
236.6 Wp/m²
227.0 Wp/m²
9.7 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
735 Wp
705 Wp
30 W more power
Open-circuit voltage
51.60 V
47.80 V
3.80 V apart
Cell technology
HJT
N-type
HJT vs N-type
Cell count
132
66
66 cells apart
Weight per kWp
53.7 kg/kWp
56.0 kg/kWp
2.3 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
43.20 V
40.20 V
3.00 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.82 A
18.50 A
0.68 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
24,737 kWh
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05
23,654 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,083 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
735 W
705 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
706 W
673 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
678 W
642 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
649 W
610 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
735 Wp
705 Wp
+30 W for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
Module efficiency
23.66 %
22.70 %
+0.96 pp for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
Power density
236.6 Wp/m²
227.0 Wp/m²
+9.7 Wp/m² for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
Open-circuit voltage
51.60 V
47.80 V
3.80 V apart
Voltage at max power
43.20 V
40.20 V
3.00 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.82 A
18.50 A
0.68 A apart
Current at max power
17.04 A
17.53 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
+0.040 %/°C for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
Same
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
39.5 kg
39.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
53.7 kg/kWp
56.0 kg/kWp
-2.3 kg/kWp for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.38 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
N-type
HJT vs N-type
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
66
66 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#602
vs
#3,307
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 leads by 2,705 places
Power density
#582
vs
#3,361
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 leads by 2,779 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#6,093
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 leads by 5,582 places
Weight
#7,773
vs
#10,338
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 leads by 2,565 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#246
vs
#1,050
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 leads by 804 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 or Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05?
According to our database: Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 has higher module efficiency (23.66% vs 22.70%); Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05?
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 has a module efficiency of 23.66%, while Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05 is 22.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 use vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05?
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 uses HJT cells; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05?
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

