Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720
VS
Vikram Solar
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720
720 Wp
23.18 %
N-type
Bifacial
The verdict
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.020 %/°C better in heat. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 9 differencesHow alike are they
10
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
9 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency
22.86 %
23.18 %
0.32 pp more efficient
Cell technology
HJT
N-type
HJT vs N-type
Power density
228.6 Wp/m²
231.8 Wp/m²
3.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
710 Wp
720 Wp
10 W more power
Short-circuit current
17.52 A
18.52 A
1.00 A apart
Open-circuit voltage
50.80 V
49.40 V
1.40 V apart
Current at max power
16.74 A
17.49 A
0.75 A apart
Voltage at max power
42.43 V
41.20 V
1.23 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05
23,896 kWh
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720
24,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
261 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
710 W
720 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.8% of rated power
682 W
690 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.6% of rated power
655 W
660 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.4% of rated power
627 W
629 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
710 Wp
720 Wp
+10 W for HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720
Module efficiency
22.86 %
23.18 %
+0.32 pp for HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720
Power density
228.6 Wp/m²
231.8 Wp/m²
+3.2 Wp/m² for HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720
Open-circuit voltage
50.80 V
49.40 V
1.40 V apart
Voltage at max power
42.43 V
41.20 V
1.23 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.52 A
18.52 A
1.00 A apart
Current at max power
16.74 A
17.49 A
0.75 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
Same
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
39.5 kg
39.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
55.6 kg/kWp
54.9 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.38 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
N-type
HJT vs N-type
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#2,536
vs
#1,424
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 leads by 1,112 places
Power density
#2,474
vs
#1,347
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 leads by 1,127 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#1,309
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 leads by 798 places
Weight
#10,005
vs
#9,249
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 leads by 756 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#881
vs
#564
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 leads by 317 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05
3 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 or Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720?
According to our database: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 has higher module efficiency (23.18% vs 22.86%); Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.280%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720?
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 has a module efficiency of 22.86%, while Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 is 23.18%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 use vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720?
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 uses HJT cells; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720?
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
