Skip to main content
600 vs 585 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585

Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600
Vikram Solar
HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600
600 Wp 23.23 % HJT Bifacial
VS
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585
Vikram Solar
HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585
585 Wp 22.65 % HJT Bifacial
The verdict

600 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.58 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 600 585 Difference
Module efficiency 23.23 % 22.65 % 0.58 pp more efficient
Power density 232.3 Wp/m² 226.5 Wp/m² 5.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 600 Wp 585 Wp 15 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
600
20,131 kWh
585
19,628 kWh
Lifetime gap
503 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 600 585
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 600 W 585 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 575 W 560 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 550 W 536 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 524 W 511 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 600 585 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 600 Wp 585 Wp +15 W for 600
Module efficiency 23.23 % 22.65 % +0.58 pp for 600
Power density 232.3 Wp/m² 226.5 Wp/m² +5.8 Wp/m² for 600
Open-circuit voltage 51.70 V 51.10 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 43.60 V 43.00 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.44 A 14.26 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.77 A 13.62 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 31.6 kg 31.6 kg Same
Weight per kWp 52.7 kg/kWp 54.0 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 72 72 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,252 vs #3,522
600 leads by 2,270 places
Power density
#1,252 vs #3,500
600 leads by 2,248 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#6,293 vs #8,221
600 leads by 1,928 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,930 vs #4,105
600 leads by 1,175 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-605
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-595
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-590
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
9 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 or Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585?
According to our database: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 has higher module efficiency (23.23% vs 22.65%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 has a module efficiency of 23.23%, while Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585 is 22.65%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 use vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 uses HJT cells; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.