Skip to main content
590 vs 595 19 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-590 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-595

Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-590
Vikram Solar
HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-590
590 Wp 22.84 % HJT Bifacial
VS
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-595
Vikram Solar
HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-595
595 Wp 23.03 % HJT Bifacial
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
19 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

0 of 19 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
590
19,796 kWh
595
19,963 kWh
Lifetime gap
167 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 590 595
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 590 W 595 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 565 W 570 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 540 W 545 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 516 W 520 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 590 595 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 590 Wp 595 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.84 % 23.03 % Effectively the same
Power density 228.4 Wp/m² 230.3 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 51.30 V 51.50 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 43.20 V 43.40 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.32 A 14.38 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.67 A 13.72 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 31.6 kg 31.6 kg Same
Weight per kWp 53.6 kg/kWp 53.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 72 72 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#2,617 vs #1,744
595 leads by 873 places
Power density
#2,598 vs #1,758
595 leads by 840 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,557 vs #6,891
595 leads by 666 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,739 vs #3,329
595 leads by 410 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-590 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-605
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-590 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-590 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-590 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-590 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-590 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-590 or Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-595?
According to our database: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-595 has higher module efficiency (23.03% vs 22.84%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-590 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-595?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-590 has a module efficiency of 22.84%, while Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-595 is 23.03%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-590 use vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-595?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-590 uses HJT cells; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-595 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-590 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-595?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-590 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-595 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-590 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-595 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-590 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-595 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.