Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-605
VS
The verdict
605 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.77 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 3 differencesHow alike are they
16
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
3 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
585
605
Difference
Module efficiency
22.65 %
23.42 %
0.77 pp more efficient
Power density
226.5 Wp/m²
234.2 Wp/m²
7.7 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
585 Wp
605 Wp
20 W more power
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
585
19,628 kWh
605
20,299 kWh
Lifetime gap
671 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
585
605
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
585 W
605 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.8% of rated power
560 W
580 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.6% of rated power
536 W
554 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.4% of rated power
511 W
529 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
585
605
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
585 Wp
605 Wp
+20 W for 605
Module efficiency
22.65 %
23.42 %
+0.77 pp for 605
Power density
226.5 Wp/m²
234.2 Wp/m²
+7.7 Wp/m² for 605
Open-circuit voltage
51.10 V
51.90 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
43.00 V
43.80 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
14.26 A
14.50 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
13.62 A
13.83 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
2.583 m²
2.583 m²
Same
Weight
31.6 kg
31.6 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
54.0 kg/kWp
52.2 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
HJT
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
72
72
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#3,522
vs
#865
605 leads by 2,657 places
Power density
#3,500
vs
#863
605 leads by 2,637 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309
vs
#1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,221
vs
#5,701
605 leads by 2,520 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,105
vs
#2,555
605 leads by 1,550 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-600
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-595
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-590
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-580
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585 or Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-605?
According to our database: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-605 has higher module efficiency (23.42% vs 22.65%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-605?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585 has a module efficiency of 22.65%, while Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-605 is 23.42%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585 use vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-605?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585 uses HJT cells; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-605 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-605?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-605 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-605 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-585 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.72.AAA.05-605 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.