Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
Vikram Solar
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720
720 Wp
23.18 %
N-type
Bifacial
VS
The verdict
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.020 %/°C better in heat. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 9 differencesHow alike are they
10
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
9 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency
23.18 %
23.50 %
0.32 pp more efficient
Cell technology
N-type
HJT
N-type vs HJT
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
235.0 Wp/m²
3.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
720 Wp
730 Wp
10 W more power
Open-circuit voltage
49.40 V
51.40 V
2.00 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.52 A
17.76 A
0.76 A apart
Voltage at max power
41.20 V
43.00 V
1.80 V apart
Current at max power
17.49 A
16.98 A
0.51 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720
24,157 kWh
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
24,569 kWh
Lifetime gap
412 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
720 W
730 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.8% of rated power
690 W
702 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.6% of rated power
660 W
673 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.4% of rated power
629 W
645 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
720 Wp
730 Wp
+10 W for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
Module efficiency
23.18 %
23.50 %
+0.32 pp for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
235.0 Wp/m²
+3.2 Wp/m² for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
Open-circuit voltage
49.40 V
51.40 V
2.00 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.20 V
43.00 V
1.80 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.52 A
17.76 A
0.76 A apart
Current at max power
17.49 A
16.98 A
0.51 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
Same
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
39.5 kg
39.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
54.9 kg/kWp
54.1 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.38 %/yr
Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
HJT
N-type vs HJT
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,424
vs
#716
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 leads by 708 places
Power density
#1,347
vs
#800
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 leads by 547 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309
vs
#511
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 leads by 798 places
Weight
#9,249
vs
#8,335
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 leads by 914 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#564
vs
#326
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 leads by 238 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05
3 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05
6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-705
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 or Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05?
According to our database: Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 23.18%); Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.280%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 has a module efficiency of 23.18%, while Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 use vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 uses N-type cells; Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
