Skip to main content
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 vs SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 13 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05

Vikram Solar
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720
720 Wp 23.18 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05
Vikram Solar
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05
715 Wp 23.02 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.020 %/°C better in heat. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 6 differences
How alike are they
13 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

6 of 19 parameters
Parameter HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.260 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Cell technology N-type HJT N-type vs HJT
Short-circuit current 18.52 A 17.58 A 0.94 A apart
Open-circuit voltage 49.40 V 50.95 V 1.55 V apart
Current at max power 17.49 A 16.80 A 0.69 A apart
Voltage at max power 41.20 V 42.57 V 1.37 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720
24,157 kWh
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05
24,064 kWh
Lifetime gap
93 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 720 W 715 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 690 W 687 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 660 W 659 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 629 W 631 W
03

Full specification

Parameter HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 720 Wp 715 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 23.18 % 23.02 % Effectively the same
Power density 231.8 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.40 V 50.95 V 1.55 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.20 V 42.57 V 1.37 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.52 A 17.58 A 0.94 A apart
Current at max power 17.49 A 16.80 A 0.69 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.260 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 39.5 kg 39.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 54.9 kg/kWp 55.2 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.38 %/yr Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology N-type HJT N-type vs HJT
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,424 vs #1,797
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 leads by 373 places
Power density
#1,347 vs #2,018
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 leads by 671 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #511
SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 leads by 798 places
Weight
#9,249 vs #9,680
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 leads by 431 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#564 vs #721
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 leads by 157 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05
3 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05
6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-705
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 or Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05?
According to our database: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 has higher module efficiency (23.18% vs 23.02%); Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.280%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 has a module efficiency of 23.18%, while Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 is 23.02%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 use vs Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 uses N-type cells; Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720 and Vikram Solar SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.