Skip to main content
AAA.05-705 vs 700.05 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-705 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05

Vikram Solar
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-705
705 Wp 22.70 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05
Vikram Solar
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05
700 Wp 22.53 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

AAA.05-705 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.020 %/°C better in heat. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter AAA.05-705 700.05 Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.300 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Cell count 132 66 66 cells apart
Open-circuit voltage 48.80 V 47.60 V 1.20 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
AAA.05-705
23,654 kWh
700.05
23,486 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario AAA.05-705 700.05
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 705 W 700 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 675 W 669 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 646 W 637 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 616 W 606 W
03

Full specification

Parameter AAA.05-705 700.05 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 705 Wp 700 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.70 % 22.53 % Effectively the same
Power density 227.0 Wp/m² 225.3 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 48.80 V 47.60 V 1.20 V apart
Voltage at max power 40.60 V 40.10 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.40 A 18.43 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.37 A 17.48 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.300 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for AAA.05-705
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 39.5 kg 39.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 56.0 kg/kWp 56.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 66 66 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,307 vs #3,982
AAA.05-705 leads by 675 places
Power density
#3,361 vs #3,989
AAA.05-705 leads by 628 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #6,093
AAA.05-705 leads by 4,784 places
Weight
#10,338 vs #10,649
AAA.05-705 leads by 311 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,050 vs #1,210
AAA.05-705 leads by 160 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-705 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-705 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05
5 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-705 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-705 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05
2 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-705 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-710
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-705 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05
3 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-705 or Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05?
According to our database: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-705 has higher module efficiency (22.70% vs 22.53%); Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-705 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-705 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-705 has a module efficiency of 22.70%, while Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 is 22.53%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-705 use vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-705 uses N-type cells; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-705 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-705 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-705 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-705 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.