Skip to main content
700.05 vs AAA.05-715 13 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715

Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05
Vikram Solar
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05
700 Wp 22.53 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Vikram Solar
HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715
715 Wp 23.02 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

AAA.05-715 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.49 pp more efficient. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 6 differences
How alike are they
13 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

6 of 19 parameters
Parameter 700.05 AAA.05-715 Difference
Module efficiency 22.53 % 23.02 % 0.49 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.280 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Power density 225.3 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² 4.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 700 Wp 715 Wp 15 W more power
Cell count 66 132 66 cells apart
Open-circuit voltage 47.60 V 49.20 V 1.60 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
700.05
23,486 kWh
AAA.05-715
23,990 kWh
Lifetime gap
504 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 700.05 AAA.05-715
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 700 W 715 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 669 W 685 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 637 W 655 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 606 W 625 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 700.05 AAA.05-715 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 700 Wp 715 Wp +15 W for AAA.05-715
Module efficiency 22.53 % 23.02 % +0.49 pp for AAA.05-715
Power density 225.3 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² +4.8 Wp/m² for AAA.05-715
Open-circuit voltage 47.60 V 49.20 V 1.60 V apart
Voltage at max power 40.10 V 41.00 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.43 A 18.48 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.48 A 17.45 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.280 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for AAA.05-715
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 39.5 kg 39.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 56.4 kg/kWp 55.2 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 66 132 66 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,982 vs #1,797
AAA.05-715 leads by 2,185 places
Power density
#3,989 vs #2,018
AAA.05-715 leads by 1,971 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #1,309
AAA.05-715 leads by 4,784 places
Weight
#10,649 vs #9,680
AAA.05-715 leads by 969 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,210 vs #721
AAA.05-715 leads by 489 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.705.05
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.695.05
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.690.05
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Vikram Solar
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715 vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 or Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715?
According to our database: Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715 has higher module efficiency (23.02% vs 22.53%); Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 has a module efficiency of 22.53%, while Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715 is 23.02%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 use vs Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 uses N-type cells; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715?
Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 has a 30 years power warranty; Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715 bifacial panels?
Both Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.700.05 and Vikram Solar HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.