Skip to main content
TSM-DE09R.08-435 vs SPR-MAX3-430-R 5 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-435 vs Maxeon SPR-MAX3-430-R

Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-435
TSM-DE09R.08-435
435 Wp 21.80 % PERC
VS
Maxeon SPR-MAX3-430-R
Maxeon
SPR-MAX3-430-R
430 Wp 22.70 % Back Contact
The verdict

SPR-MAX3-430-R leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.90 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 14 differences
How alike are they
5 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

14 of 19 parameters
Parameter TSM-DE09R.08-435 SPR-MAX3-430-R Difference
Module efficiency 21.80 % 22.70 % 0.90 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.270 %/°C 0.070 %/°C better in heat
Performance warranty 25 yrs 40 yrs 15 yrs longer
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr 0.25 %/yr 0.30 %/yr slower
Power density 217.7 Wp/m² 226.9 Wp/m² 9.2 Wp/m² higher
Product warranty 15 yrs 40 yrs 25 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage 50.40 V 40.70 V 9.70 V apart
Short-circuit current 10.67 A 13.15 A 2.48 A apart
Module area 1.998 m² 1.895 m² 0.103 m² apart
Cell technology PERC Back Contact PERC vs Back Contact
Voltage at max power 42.50 V 35.10 V 7.40 V apart
Current at max power 10.24 A 12.25 A 2.01 A apart
Cell count 144 112 32 cells apart
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1812x1046x40 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1812x1046x40 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
TSM-DE09R.08-435
14,098 kWh
SPR-MAX3-430-R
14,609 kWh
Lifetime gap
511 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario TSM-DE09R.08-435 SPR-MAX3-430-R
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 435 W 430 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 413 W 413 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 391 W 395 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 368 W 378 W
03

Full specification

Parameter TSM-DE09R.08-435 SPR-MAX3-430-R Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 435 Wp 430 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 21.80 % 22.70 % +0.90 pp for SPR-MAX3-430-R
Power density 217.7 Wp/m² 226.9 Wp/m² +9.2 Wp/m² for SPR-MAX3-430-R
Open-circuit voltage 50.40 V 40.70 V 9.70 V apart
Voltage at max power 42.50 V 35.10 V 7.40 V apart
Short-circuit current 10.67 A 13.15 A 2.48 A apart
Current at max power 10.24 A 12.25 A 2.01 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.270 %/°C +0.070 %/°C for SPR-MAX3-430-R
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1812x1046x40 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1812x1046x40 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 1.895 m² 0.103 m² apart
Weight 21.8 kg 21.2 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 50.1 kg/kWp 49.3 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 40 yrs +25 yrs for SPR-MAX3-430-R
Performance warranty 25 yrs 40 yrs +15 yrs for SPR-MAX3-430-R
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr 0.25 %/yr -0.30 %/yr for SPR-MAX3-430-R
Technology
Cell technology PERC Back Contact PERC vs Back Contact
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 112 32 cells apart
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#7,022 vs #3,307
SPR-MAX3-430-R leads by 3,715 places
Power density
#7,066 vs #3,463
SPR-MAX3-430-R leads by 3,603 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778 vs #1,280
SPR-MAX3-430-R leads by 7,498 places
Weight
#3,611 vs #2,855
SPR-MAX3-430-R leads by 756 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #1
SPR-MAX3-430-R leads by 9,797 places
Overall
#10,319 vs #1,774
SPR-MAX3-430-R leads by 8,545 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-435 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE09R-435
One difference: product warranty
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-435 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE09R-430
2 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-435 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-430
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-435 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE09R-425
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-435 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-425
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-435 vs Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-420
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-435 or Maxeon SPR-MAX3-430-R?
According to our database: Maxeon SPR-MAX3-430-R has higher module efficiency (22.70% vs 21.80%); Maxeon SPR-MAX3-430-R tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.270%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-435 and Maxeon SPR-MAX3-430-R?
Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-435 has a module efficiency of 21.80%, while Maxeon SPR-MAX3-430-R is 22.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-435 use vs Maxeon SPR-MAX3-430-R?
Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-435 uses PERC cells; Maxeon SPR-MAX3-430-R uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-435 and Maxeon SPR-MAX3-430-R?
Trina Solar TSM-DE09R.08-435 has a 25 years power warranty; Maxeon SPR-MAX3-430-R has a 40 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Compare Trina Solar and Maxeon as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 242 Trina Solar offers · See 26 Maxeon offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.