Skip to main content
20-725 vs 20 735 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-725 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 735

Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-725
TSM-NEG21C.20-725
725 Wp 23.30 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 735
TSM-NEG21C.20 735
735 Wp 23.70 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

20 735 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.40 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 20-725 20 735 Difference
Module efficiency 23.30 % 23.70 % 0.40 pp more efficient
Power density 233.4 Wp/m² 236.6 Wp/m² 3.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 725 Wp 735 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
20-725
24,325 kWh
20 735
24,661 kWh
Lifetime gap
336 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 20-725 20 735
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 725 W 735 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 693 W 703 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 662 W 671 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 630 W 639 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 20-725 20 735 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 725 Wp 735 Wp +10 W for 20 735
Module efficiency 23.30 % 23.70 % +0.40 pp for 20 735
Power density 233.4 Wp/m² 236.6 Wp/m² +3.2 Wp/m² for 20 735
Open-circuit voltage 49.60 V 50.10 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.50 V 41.90 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.54 A 18.62 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.47 A 17.55 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.3 kg 38.3 kg Same
Weight per kWp 52.8 kg/kWp 52.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,017 vs #517
20 735 leads by 500 places
Power density
#936 vs #582
20 735 leads by 354 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#6,514 vs #5,576
20 735 leads by 938 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#424 vs #233
20 735 leads by 191 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-725 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-725 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-735
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-725 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-730
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-725 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-720
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-725 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 735 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-725 or Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 735?
According to our database: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 735 has higher module efficiency (23.70% vs 23.30%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-725 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 735?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-725 has a module efficiency of 23.30%, while Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 735 is 23.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-725 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 735?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-725 uses TOPCon cells; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 735 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-725 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 735?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-725 has a 30 years power warranty; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 735 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-725 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 735 bifacial panels?
Both Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-725 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 735 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 248 Trina Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.