Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-485 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740
VS
The verdict
NEG21C.20 740 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.00 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
14 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
NEG18R.28-485
NEG21C.20 740
Difference
Module efficiency
21.80 %
23.80 %
2.00 pp more efficient
Rated power
485 Wp
740 Wp
255 W more power
Power density
218.1 Wp/m²
238.2 Wp/m²
20.1 Wp/m² higher
Weight
23.5 kg
38.3 kg
14.8 kg lighter
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
3 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
39.40 V
50.30 V
10.90 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.76 A
18.66 A
2.90 A apart
Module area
2.224 m²
3.106 m²
0.883 m² apart
Weight per kWp
48.5 kg/kWp
51.8 kg/kWp
3.3 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
32.70 V
42.10 V
9.40 V apart
Current at max power
14.84 A
17.58 A
2.74 A apart
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
1961x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1961x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
NEG18R.28-485
16,273 kWh
NEG21C.20 740
24,828 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,555 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
NEG18R.28-485
NEG21C.20 740
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
485 W
740 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
464 W
708 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
443 W
676 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
422 W
643 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
NEG18R.28-485
NEG21C.20 740
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
485 Wp
740 Wp
+255 W for NEG21C.20 740
Module efficiency
21.80 %
23.80 %
+2.00 pp for NEG21C.20 740
Power density
218.1 Wp/m²
238.2 Wp/m²
+20.1 Wp/m² for NEG21C.20 740
Open-circuit voltage
39.40 V
50.30 V
10.90 V apart
Voltage at max power
32.70 V
42.10 V
9.40 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.76 A
18.66 A
2.90 A apart
Current at max power
14.84 A
17.58 A
2.74 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1961x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1961x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.224 m²
3.106 m²
0.883 m² apart
Weight
23.5 kg
38.3 kg
-14.8 kg for NEG18R.28-485
Weight per kWp
48.5 kg/kWp
51.8 kg/kWp
-3.3 kg/kWp for NEG18R.28-485
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
+3 yrs for NEG18R.28-485
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#7,022
vs
#433
NEG21C.20 740 leads by 6,589 places
Power density
#6,998
vs
#431
NEG21C.20 740 leads by 6,567 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,282
vs
#5,125
NEG18R.28-485 leads by 2,843 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7,974
vs
#185
NEG21C.20 740 leads by 7,789 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-485 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-510
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-485 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-505
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-485 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-500
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-485 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-495
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-485 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-490
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-485 or Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740?
According to our database: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 21.80%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-485 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-485 has a module efficiency of 21.80%, while Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 is 23.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-485 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-485 uses TOPCon cells; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-485 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-485 has a 30 years power warranty; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-485 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 bifacial panels?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20 740 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-485 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 213 Trina Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

