Skip to main content
NEG18R.20-520 vs NEG21C.20-735 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-520 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-735

Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-520
TSM-NEG18R.20-520
520 Wp 23.40 % TOPCon
VS
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-735
TSM-NEG21C.20-735
735 Wp 23.70 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

13 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 215 W more power. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter NEG18R.20-520 NEG21C.20-735 Difference
Rated power 520 Wp 735 Wp 215 W more power
Weight 23.5 kg 38.3 kg 14.8 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 45.2 kg/kWp 52.1 kg/kWp 6.9 kg/kWp lighter
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs 3 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage 41.20 V 50.10 V 8.90 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.99 A 18.62 A 2.63 A apart
Module area 2.224 m² 3.106 m² 0.883 m² apart
Module efficiency 23.40 % 23.70 % 0.30 pp more efficient
Voltage at max power 34.10 V 41.90 V 7.80 V apart
Current at max power 15.25 A 17.55 A 2.30 A apart
Cell count 108 132 24 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 1961x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 1961x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
NEG18R.20-520
17,447 kWh
NEG21C.20-735
24,661 kWh
Lifetime gap
7,214 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario NEG18R.20-520 NEG21C.20-735
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 520 W 735 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 497 W 703 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 475 W 671 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 452 W 639 W
03

Full specification

Parameter NEG18R.20-520 NEG21C.20-735 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 520 Wp 735 Wp +215 W for NEG21C.20-735
Module efficiency 23.40 % 23.70 % +0.30 pp for NEG21C.20-735
Power density 233.8 Wp/m² 236.6 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 41.20 V 50.10 V 8.90 V apart
Voltage at max power 34.10 V 41.90 V 7.80 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.99 A 18.62 A 2.63 A apart
Current at max power 15.25 A 17.55 A 2.30 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1961x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 1961x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.224 m² 3.106 m² 0.883 m² apart
Weight 23.5 kg 38.3 kg -14.8 kg for NEG18R.20-520
Weight per kWp 45.2 kg/kWp 52.1 kg/kWp -6.9 kg/kWp for NEG18R.20-520
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs +3 yrs for NEG18R.20-520
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 132 24 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#882 vs #517
NEG21C.20-735 leads by 365 places
Power density
#909 vs #582
NEG21C.20-735 leads by 327 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#635 vs #5,576
NEG18R.20-520 leads by 4,941 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,727 vs #233
NEG21C.20-735 leads by 4,494 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-520 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-515
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-735 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-740
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-735 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-730
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-735 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-725
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-735 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-720
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-735 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-520 or Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-735?
According to our database: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-735 has higher module efficiency (23.70% vs 23.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-520 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-735?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-520 has a module efficiency of 23.40%, while Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-735 is 23.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-520 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-735?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-520 uses TOPCon cells; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-735 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-520 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-735?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-520 has a 30 years power warranty; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-735 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-520 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-735 bifacial panels?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20-735 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.20-520 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 250 Trina Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.