Skip to main content
TWMNH-48HC435 vs TWMNF-66HD745 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435 vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD745

Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435
TWMNH-48HC435
435 Wp 21.80 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Tongwei TWMNF-66HD745
TWMNF-66HD745
745 Wp 24.00 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

TWMNF-66HD745 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 2.20 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter TWMNH-48HC435 TWMNF-66HD745 Difference
Module efficiency 21.80 % 24.00 % 2.20 pp more efficient
Rated power 435 Wp 745 Wp 310 W more power
Power density 217.7 Wp/m² 239.8 Wp/m² 22.1 Wp/m² higher
Weight 20.9 kg 37.3 kg 16.4 kg lighter
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs 3 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage 34.49 V 49.95 V 15.46 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.90 A 18.87 A 2.97 A apart
Module area 1.998 m² 3.106 m² 1.108 m² apart
Voltage at max power 29.54 V 41.86 V 12.32 V apart
Current at max power 14.73 A 17.80 A 3.07 A apart
Cell count 96 132 36 cells apart
Weight per kWp 48.0 kg/kWp 50.1 kg/kWp 2.0 kg/kWp lighter
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
TWMNH-48HC435
14,595 kWh
TWMNF-66HD745
24,996 kWh
Lifetime gap
10,401 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario TWMNH-48HC435 TWMNF-66HD745
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 435 W 745 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 417 W 714 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 398 W 682 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 380 W 651 W
03

Full specification

Parameter TWMNH-48HC435 TWMNF-66HD745 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 435 Wp 745 Wp +310 W for TWMNF-66HD745
Module efficiency 21.80 % 24.00 % +2.20 pp for TWMNF-66HD745
Power density 217.7 Wp/m² 239.8 Wp/m² +22.1 Wp/m² for TWMNF-66HD745
Open-circuit voltage 34.49 V 49.95 V 15.46 V apart
Voltage at max power 29.54 V 41.86 V 12.32 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.90 A 18.87 A 2.97 A apart
Current at max power 14.73 A 17.80 A 3.07 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 3.106 m² 1.108 m² apart
Weight 20.9 kg 37.3 kg -16.4 kg for TWMNH-48HC435
Weight per kWp 48.0 kg/kWp 50.1 kg/kWp -2.0 kg/kWp for TWMNH-48HC435
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs +3 yrs for TWMNH-48HC435
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 96 132 36 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#7,022 vs #303
TWMNF-66HD745 leads by 6,719 places
Power density
#7,066 vs #339
TWMNF-66HD745 leads by 6,727 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,031 vs #3,586
TWMNH-48HC435 leads by 1,555 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,574 vs #148
TWMNF-66HD745 leads by 9,426 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435 vs Tongwei TWMNH-48HC450
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435 vs Tongwei TWMNH-48HC445
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435 vs Tongwei TWMNH-48HC440
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435 vs Tongwei TWMNH-48HC430
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNF-66HD745 vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD750
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNF-66HD745 vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD740
One difference: module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435 or Tongwei TWMNF-66HD745?
According to our database: Tongwei TWMNF-66HD745 has higher module efficiency (24.00% vs 21.80%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435 and Tongwei TWMNF-66HD745?
Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435 has a module efficiency of 21.80%, while Tongwei TWMNF-66HD745 is 24.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435 use vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD745?
Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435 uses TOPCon cells; Tongwei TWMNF-66HD745 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435 and Tongwei TWMNF-66HD745?
Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435 has a 30 years power warranty; Tongwei TWMNF-66HD745 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435 and Tongwei TWMNF-66HD745 bifacial panels?
Both Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435 and Tongwei TWMNF-66HD745 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 72 Tongwei offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.