Skip to main content
TWMNH-48HW470 vs JAM54D40-465/LR 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Tongwei TWMNH-48HW470 vs JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR

Tongwei TWMNH-48HW470
TWMNH-48HW470
470 Wp 23.50 % N-type
VS
JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR
JAM54D40-465/LR
465 Wp 23.30 % N-type
The verdict

9 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is open-circuit voltage: 3.65 V apart. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter TWMNH-48HW470 JAM54D40-465/LR Difference
Open-circuit voltage 36.55 V 40.20 V 3.65 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.95 A 14.65 A 1.30 A apart
Weight 23.7 kg 22.0 kg 1.7 kg lighter
Module efficiency 23.50 % 23.30 % 0.20 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.010 %/°C better in heat
Weight per kWp 50.4 kg/kWp 47.3 kg/kWp 3.1 kg/kWp lighter
Cell count 96 108 12 cells apart
Current at max power 15.26 A 13.88 A 1.38 A apart
Voltage at max power 30.80 V 33.50 V 2.70 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
TWMNH-48HW470
15,769 kWh
JAM54D40-465/LR
15,602 kWh
Lifetime gap
167 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario TWMNH-48HW470 JAM54D40-465/LR
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 470 W 465 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 450 W 445 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 431 W 425 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 411 W 404 W
03

Full specification

Parameter TWMNH-48HW470 JAM54D40-465/LR Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 470 Wp 465 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 23.50 % 23.30 % +0.20 pp for TWMNH-48HW470
Power density 235.2 Wp/m² 232.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 36.55 V 40.20 V 3.65 V apart
Voltage at max power 30.80 V 33.50 V 2.70 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.95 A 14.65 A 1.30 A apart
Current at max power 15.26 A 13.88 A 1.38 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.010 %/°C for TWMNH-48HW470
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.998 m² 1.998 m² Same
Weight 23.7 kg 22.0 kg -1.7 kg for JAM54D40-465/LR
Weight per kWp 50.4 kg/kWp 47.3 kg/kWp -3.1 kg/kWp for JAM54D40-465/LR
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 96 108 12 cells apart
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#716 vs #1,017
TWMNH-48HW470 leads by 301 places
Power density
#674 vs #1,115
TWMNH-48HW470 leads by 441 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #2,165
TWMNH-48HW470 leads by 856 places
Weight
#3,804 vs #1,632
JAM54D40-465/LR leads by 2,172 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,415 vs #6,780
TWMNH-48HW470 leads by 365 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-48HW470 vs Tongwei TWMNH-48HW475
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-48HW470 vs Tongwei TWMNH-48HW465
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-48HW470 vs Tongwei TWMNH-48HW460
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-48HW470 vs Tongwei TWMNH-48HW455
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LR
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR
One difference: module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Tongwei TWMNH-48HW470 or JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR?
According to our database: Tongwei TWMNH-48HW470 has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 23.30%); Tongwei TWMNH-48HW470 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Tongwei TWMNH-48HW470 and JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR?
Tongwei TWMNH-48HW470 has a module efficiency of 23.50%, while JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR is 23.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Tongwei TWMNH-48HW470 use vs JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR?
Tongwei TWMNH-48HW470 uses N-type cells; JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Tongwei TWMNH-48HW470 and JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR?
Tongwei TWMNH-48HW470 has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Compare Tongwei and JA Solar as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 72 Tongwei offers · See 391 JA Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.