Tongwei TWMNF-66HD750 vs Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435
VS
The verdict
TWMNF-66HD750 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.30 pp more efficient. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 12 differencesHow alike are they
7
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
12 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
TWMNF-66HD750
TWMNH-48HC435
Difference
Module efficiency
24.10 %
21.80 %
2.30 pp more efficient
Rated power
750 Wp
435 Wp
315 W more power
Power density
241.4 Wp/m²
217.7 Wp/m²
23.7 Wp/m² higher
Weight
37.3 kg
20.9 kg
16.4 kg lighter
Product warranty
12 yrs
15 yrs
3 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
50.10 V
34.49 V
15.61 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.93 A
15.90 A
3.03 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
1.998 m²
1.108 m² apart
Voltage at max power
42.02 V
29.54 V
12.48 V apart
Current at max power
17.85 A
14.73 A
3.12 A apart
Cell count
132
96
36 cells apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
TWMNF-66HD750
25,164 kWh
TWMNH-48HC435
14,595 kWh
Lifetime gap
10,569 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
TWMNF-66HD750
TWMNH-48HC435
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
750 W
435 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.8% of rated power
719 W
417 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.6% of rated power
687 W
398 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.4% of rated power
656 W
380 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
TWMNF-66HD750
TWMNH-48HC435
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
750 Wp
435 Wp
+315 W for TWMNF-66HD750
Module efficiency
24.10 %
21.80 %
+2.30 pp for TWMNF-66HD750
Power density
241.4 Wp/m²
217.7 Wp/m²
+23.7 Wp/m² for TWMNF-66HD750
Open-circuit voltage
50.10 V
34.49 V
15.61 V apart
Voltage at max power
42.02 V
29.54 V
12.48 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.93 A
15.90 A
3.03 A apart
Current at max power
17.85 A
14.73 A
3.12 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
1.998 m²
1.108 m² apart
Weight
37.3 kg
20.9 kg
-16.4 kg for TWMNH-48HC435
Weight per kWp
49.7 kg/kWp
48.0 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
15 yrs
+3 yrs for TWMNH-48HC435
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
96
36 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#219
vs
#7,022
TWMNF-66HD750 leads by 6,803 places
Power density
#219
vs
#7,066
TWMNF-66HD750 leads by 6,847 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309
vs
#1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#3,210
vs
#2,031
TWMNH-48HC435 leads by 1,179 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#122
vs
#9,574
TWMNF-66HD750 leads by 9,452 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNF-66HD750 vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD745
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNF-66HD750 vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD740
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNF-66HD750 vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD735
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNF-66HD750 vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD730
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435 vs Tongwei TWMNH-48HC450
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435 vs Tongwei TWMNH-48HC445
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Tongwei TWMNF-66HD750 or Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435?
According to our database: Tongwei TWMNF-66HD750 has higher module efficiency (24.10% vs 21.80%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Tongwei TWMNF-66HD750 and Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435?
Tongwei TWMNF-66HD750 has a module efficiency of 24.10%, while Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435 is 21.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Tongwei TWMNF-66HD750 use vs Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435?
Tongwei TWMNF-66HD750 uses TOPCon cells; Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Tongwei TWMNF-66HD750 and Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435?
Tongwei TWMNF-66HD750 has a 30 years power warranty; Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Tongwei TWMNF-66HD750 and Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435 bifacial panels?
Both Tongwei TWMNF-66HD750 and Tongwei TWMNH-48HC435 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 72 Tongwei offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.