Skip to main content
TP540HG10B-535 vs TP550HG10TB 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-535 vs Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB

Tata Power Solar
TP540HG10B-535
535 Wp 20.71 % PERC Bifacial
VS
Tata Power Solar
TP550HG10TB
550 Wp 21.29 % PERC Bifacial
The verdict

TP550HG10TB leads on the differences that matter

The largest is performance warranty: 5 yrs longer. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter TP540HG10B-535 TP550HG10TB Difference
Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs 5 yrs longer
Module efficiency 20.71 % 21.29 % 0.58 pp more efficient
Weight 33.0 kg 29.0 kg 4.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 61.7 kg/kWp 52.7 kg/kWp 9.0 kg/kWp lighter
Annual degradation 0.60 %/yr 0.72 %/yr 0.12 %/yr slower
Power density 207.1 Wp/m² 212.9 Wp/m² 5.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 535 Wp 550 Wp 15 W more power
Product warranty 12 yrs 10 yrs 2 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient -0.370 %/°C -0.360 %/°C 0.010 %/°C better in heat
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
TP540HG10B-535
17,103 kWh
TP550HG10TB
17,238 kWh
Lifetime gap
135 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario TP540HG10B-535 TP550HG10TB
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 535 W 550 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.5% of rated power 505 W 520 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 88.9% of rated power 476 W 491 W
Hot roof 70 °C 83.3% of rated power 446 W 461 W
03

Full specification

Parameter TP540HG10B-535 TP550HG10TB Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 535 Wp 550 Wp +15 W for TP550HG10TB
Module efficiency 20.71 % 21.29 % +0.58 pp for TP550HG10TB
Power density 207.1 Wp/m² 212.9 Wp/m² +5.8 Wp/m² for TP550HG10TB
Open-circuit voltage 49.40 V 49.75 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 42.35 V 42.62 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.20 A 13.42 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 12.63 A 12.90 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.370 %/°C -0.360 %/°C +0.010 %/°C for TP550HG10TB
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x35 mm 2278x1134x35 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 33.0 kg 29.0 kg -4.0 kg for TP550HG10TB
Weight per kWp 61.7 kg/kWp 52.7 kg/kWp -9.0 kg/kWp for TP550HG10TB
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 10 yrs +2 yrs for TP540HG10B-535
Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs +5 yrs for TP540HG10B-535
Annual degradation 0.60 %/yr 0.72 %/yr -0.12 %/yr for TP540HG10B-535
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#10,721 vs #8,708
TP550HG10TB leads by 2,013 places
Power density
#10,764 vs #8,497
TP550HG10TB leads by 2,267 places
Heat behaviour
#13,081 vs #12,345
TP550HG10TB leads by 736 places
Weight
#12,676 vs #6,373
TP550HG10TB leads by 6,303 places
Warranty
#21 vs #9,798
TP540HG10B-535 leads by 9,777 places
Overall
#8,359 vs #8,571
TP540HG10B-535 leads by 212 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-535 vs Tata Power Solar TP590LG10B
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-535 vs Tata Power Solar TP580LG10B
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-535 vs Tata Power Solar TP570LG10B
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-535 vs Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-550
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-535 vs Tata Power Solar TP545HG10TB
9 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-535 vs Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-545
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-535 or Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB?
According to our database: Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB has higher module efficiency (21.29% vs 20.71%); Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.360%/°C vs -0.370%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-535 and Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB?
Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-535 has a module efficiency of 20.71%, while Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB is 21.29%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-535 use vs Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB?
Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-535 uses PERC cells; Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-535 and Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB?
Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-535 has a 30 years power warranty; Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-535 and Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB bifacial panels?
Both Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-535 and Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.