Skip to main content
STP730S-D66-Nsh+ vs STP-NT11/66QGDF-670 7 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-670

Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+
STP730S-D66-Nsh+
730 Wp 23.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-670
STP-NT11/66QGDF-670
670 Wp 24.80 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

STP-NT11/66QGDF-670 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.30 pp more efficient. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 12 differences
How alike are they
7 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

12 of 19 parameters
Parameter STP730S-D66-Nsh+ STP-NT11/66QGDF-670 Difference
Module efficiency 23.50 % 24.80 % 1.30 pp more efficient
Rated power 730 Wp 670 Wp 60 W more power
Power density 235.0 Wp/m² 248.0 Wp/m² 13.0 Wp/m² higher
Weight 37.5 kg 33.1 kg 4.4 kg lighter
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.260 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Module area 3.106 m² 2.701 m² 0.405 m² apart
Short-circuit current 18.54 A 16.64 A 1.90 A apart
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.35 %/yr 0.05 %/yr slower
Cell count 132 264 132 cells apart
Current at max power 17.70 A 15.84 A 1.86 A apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Voltage at max power 41.27 V 42.34 V 1.07 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
STP730S-D66-Nsh+
24,493 kWh
STP-NT11/66QGDF-670
22,655 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,838 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario STP730S-D66-Nsh+ STP-NT11/66QGDF-670
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 730 W 670 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 699 W 644 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 669 W 618 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 638 W 592 W
03

Full specification

Parameter STP730S-D66-Nsh+ STP-NT11/66QGDF-670 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 730 Wp 670 Wp +60 W for STP730S-D66-Nsh+
Module efficiency 23.50 % 24.80 % +1.30 pp for STP-NT11/66QGDF-670
Power density 235.0 Wp/m² 248.0 Wp/m² +13.0 Wp/m² for STP-NT11/66QGDF-670
Open-circuit voltage 49.66 V 50.60 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.27 V 42.34 V 1.07 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.54 A 16.64 A 1.90 A apart
Current at max power 17.70 A 15.84 A 1.86 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.260 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for STP-NT11/66QGDF-670
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.701 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 37.5 kg 33.1 kg -4.4 kg for STP-NT11/66QGDF-670
Weight per kWp 51.4 kg/kWp 49.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.35 %/yr -0.05 %/yr for STP-NT11/66QGDF-670
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 264 132 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#716 vs #12
STP-NT11/66QGDF-670 leads by 704 places
Power density
#800 vs #14
STP-NT11/66QGDF-670 leads by 786 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #511
STP-NT11/66QGDF-670 leads by 798 places
Weight
#4,748 vs #2,907
STP-NT11/66QGDF-670 leads by 1,841 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#196 vs #302
STP730S-D66-Nsh+ leads by 106 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP735S-D66-Nsh+
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP725S-D66-Nsh+
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP720S-D66-Nsh+
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP715S-D66-Nsh+
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP705S-D66-Nsh+
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ or Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-670?
According to our database: Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-670 has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 23.50%); Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-670 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.280%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ and Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-670?
Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ has a module efficiency of 23.50%, while Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-670 is 24.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ use vs Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-670?
Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ uses TOPCon cells; Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-670 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ and Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-670?
Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ has a 30 years power warranty; Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-670 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ and Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-670 bifacial panels?
Both Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ and Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-670 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 31 Suntech offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.