Skip to main content
STP710S-D66-Nsh+ vs STP670S-D66/Wmh 7 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP670S-D66/Wmh

Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+
STP710S-D66-Nsh+
710 Wp 22.86 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Suntech STP670S-D66/Wmh
STP670S-D66/Wmh
670 Wp 21.60 % TOPCon
The verdict

STP710S-D66-Nsh+ leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.26 pp more efficient. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 12 differences
How alike are they
7 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

12 of 19 parameters
Parameter STP710S-D66-Nsh+ STP670S-D66/Wmh Difference
Module efficiency 22.86 % 21.60 % 1.26 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.340 %/°C 0.050 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 710 Wp 670 Wp 40 W more power
Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 215.7 Wp/m² 12.9 Wp/m² higher
Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs 5 yrs longer
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.55 %/yr 0.15 %/yr slower
Weight 38.5 kg 33.5 kg 5.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 54.2 kg/kWp 50.0 kg/kWp 4.2 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 48.77 V 46.45 V 2.32 V apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Voltage at max power 40.48 V 38.45 V 2.03 V apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
STP710S-D66-Nsh+
23,822 kWh
STP670S-D66/Wmh
21,714 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,108 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario STP710S-D66-Nsh+ STP670S-D66/Wmh
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 710 W 670 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 679 W 636 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 648 W 602 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 617 W 567 W
03

Full specification

Parameter STP710S-D66-Nsh+ STP670S-D66/Wmh Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 710 Wp 670 Wp +40 W for STP710S-D66-Nsh+
Module efficiency 22.86 % 21.60 % +1.26 pp for STP710S-D66-Nsh+
Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 215.7 Wp/m² +12.9 Wp/m² for STP710S-D66-Nsh+
Open-circuit voltage 48.77 V 46.45 V 2.32 V apart
Voltage at max power 40.48 V 38.45 V 2.03 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.48 A 18.43 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.54 A 17.43 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.340 %/°C +0.050 %/°C for STP710S-D66-Nsh+
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.5 kg 33.5 kg -5.0 kg for STP670S-D66/Wmh
Weight per kWp 54.2 kg/kWp 50.0 kg/kWp -4.2 kg/kWp for STP670S-D66/Wmh
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs +5 yrs for STP710S-D66-Nsh+
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.55 %/yr -0.15 %/yr for STP710S-D66-Nsh+
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#2,536 vs #7,652
STP710S-D66-Nsh+ leads by 5,116 places
Power density
#2,474 vs #7,644
STP710S-D66-Nsh+ leads by 5,170 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #8,778
STP710S-D66-Nsh+ leads by 6,613 places
Weight
#8,457 vs #3,317
STP670S-D66/Wmh leads by 5,140 places
Warranty
#21 vs #9,798
STP710S-D66-Nsh+ leads by 9,777 places
Overall
#869 vs #3,364
STP710S-D66-Nsh+ leads by 2,495 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP735S-D66-Nsh+
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP725S-D66-Nsh+
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP720S-D66-Nsh+
7 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP715S-D66-Nsh+
3 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP705S-D66-Nsh+
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ or Suntech STP670S-D66/Wmh?
According to our database: Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ has higher module efficiency (22.86% vs 21.60%); Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ and Suntech STP670S-D66/Wmh?
Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ has a module efficiency of 22.86%, while Suntech STP670S-D66/Wmh is 21.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ use vs Suntech STP670S-D66/Wmh?
Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ uses TOPCon cells; Suntech STP670S-D66/Wmh uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ and Suntech STP670S-D66/Wmh?
Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ has a 30 years power warranty; Suntech STP670S-D66/Wmh has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ and Suntech STP670S-D66/Wmh bifacial panels?
Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Suntech STP670S-D66/Wmh is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 31 Suntech offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.