Skip to main content
STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 vs STP730S-D66-Nsh+ 8 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 vs Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+

Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-650
STP-NT11/66QGDF-650
650 Wp 24.10 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+
STP730S-D66-Nsh+
730 Wp 23.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 80 W more power. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
8 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

11 of 19 parameters
Parameter STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 STP730S-D66-Nsh+ Difference
Rated power 650 Wp 730 Wp 80 W more power
Module efficiency 24.10 % 23.50 % 0.60 pp more efficient
Weight 33.1 kg 37.5 kg 4.4 kg lighter
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.280 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Short-circuit current 16.36 A 18.54 A 2.18 A apart
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Power density 240.6 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² 5.6 Wp/m² higher
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.40 %/yr 0.05 %/yr slower
Current at max power 15.57 A 17.70 A 2.13 A apart
Cell count 264 132 132 cells apart
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
STP-NT11/66QGDF-650
21,978 kWh
STP730S-D66-Nsh+
24,493 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,515 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 STP730S-D66-Nsh+
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 650 W 730 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 625 W 699 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 599 W 669 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 574 W 638 W
03

Full specification

Parameter STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 STP730S-D66-Nsh+ Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 650 Wp 730 Wp +80 W for STP730S-D66-Nsh+
Module efficiency 24.10 % 23.50 % +0.60 pp for STP-NT11/66QGDF-650
Power density 240.6 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² +5.6 Wp/m² for STP-NT11/66QGDF-650
Open-circuit voltage 50.00 V 49.66 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.76 V 41.27 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 16.36 A 18.54 A 2.18 A apart
Current at max power 15.57 A 17.70 A 2.13 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.280 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for STP-NT11/66QGDF-650
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 33.1 kg 37.5 kg -4.4 kg for STP-NT11/66QGDF-650
Weight per kWp 50.9 kg/kWp 51.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.40 %/yr -0.05 %/yr for STP-NT11/66QGDF-650
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 264 132 132 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#219 vs #716
STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 leads by 497 places
Power density
#233 vs #800
STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 leads by 567 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #1,309
STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 leads by 798 places
Weight
#4,300 vs #4,748
STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 leads by 448 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#891 vs #196
STP730S-D66-Nsh+ leads by 695 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 vs Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-670
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 vs Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-665
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 vs Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-660
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 vs Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-655
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 vs Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-645
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 vs Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-640
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 or Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+?
According to our database: Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 has higher module efficiency (24.10% vs 23.50%); Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.280%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 and Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+?
Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 has a module efficiency of 24.10%, while Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 use vs Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+?
Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 uses TOPCon cells; Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 and Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+?
Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 has a 30 years power warranty; Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 and Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ bifacial panels?
Both Suntech STP-NT11/66QGDF-650 and Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+ are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 31 Suntech offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.