Skip to main content
SP620W-210R-132DS vs SP-96DSN455 9 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Sunpro Power SP620W-210R-132DS vs Sunpro Power SP-96DSN455

Sunpro Power SP620W-210R-132DS
Sunpro Power
SP620W-210R-132DS
620 Wp 22.95 % HJT Bifacial
VS
Sunpro Power SP-96DSN455
Sunpro Power
SP-96DSN455
455 Wp 22.77 % HJT Bifacial
The verdict

10 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 165 W more power. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters
Parameter SP620W-210R-132DS SP-96DSN455 Difference
Rated power 620 Wp 455 Wp 165 W more power
Weight 32.6 kg 23.0 kg 9.6 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 49.15 V 36.77 V 12.38 V apart
Module area 2.701 m² 1.998 m² 0.703 m² apart
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr 0.38 %/yr 0.08 %/yr slower
Voltage at max power 41.05 V 30.90 V 10.15 V apart
Cell count 132 96 36 cells apart
Weight per kWp 52.6 kg/kWp 50.5 kg/kWp 2.0 kg/kWp lighter
Short-circuit current 15.96 A 15.43 A 0.53 A apart
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.240 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
SP620W-210R-132DS
21,126 kWh
SP-96DSN455
15,314 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,812 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario SP620W-210R-132DS SP-96DSN455
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 620 W 455 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.4% of rated power 598 W 439 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.8% of rated power 575 W 422 W
Hot roof 70 °C 89.2% of rated power 553 W 406 W
03

Full specification

Parameter SP620W-210R-132DS SP-96DSN455 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 620 Wp 455 Wp +165 W for SP620W-210R-132DS
Module efficiency 22.95 % 22.77 % Effectively the same
Power density 229.5 Wp/m² 227.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.15 V 36.77 V 12.38 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.05 V 30.90 V 10.15 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.96 A 15.43 A 0.53 A apart
Current at max power 15.12 A 14.73 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.240 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 1.998 m² 0.703 m² apart
Weight 32.6 kg 23.0 kg -9.6 kg for SP-96DSN455
Weight per kWp 52.6 kg/kWp 50.5 kg/kWp -2.0 kg/kWp for SP-96DSN455
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr 0.38 %/yr -0.08 %/yr for SP620W-210R-132DS
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 96 36 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#2,268 vs #3,073
SP620W-210R-132DS leads by 805 places
Power density
#2,191 vs #2,888
SP620W-210R-132DS leads by 697 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #13
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#6,207 vs #3,925
SP-96DSN455 leads by 2,282 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,098 vs #7,882
SP620W-210R-132DS leads by 5,784 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SP620W-210R-132DS vs Sunpro Power SP630W-210R-132DS
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SP620W-210R-132DS vs Sunpro Power SP610W-210R-132DS
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SP620W-210R-132DS vs Sunpro Power SP600W-210R-132DS
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SP620W-210R-132DS vs Sunpro Power SP-96DSB460
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SP620W-210R-132DS vs Sunpro Power SP-96DSN460
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SP620W-210R-132DS vs Sunpro Power SP-96DSB455
10 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Sunpro Power SP620W-210R-132DS or Sunpro Power SP-96DSN455?
According to our database: Sunpro Power SP620 W-210R-132DS has higher module efficiency (22.95% vs 22.77%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Sunpro Power SP620W-210R-132DS and Sunpro Power SP-96DSN455?
Sunpro Power SP620 W-210R-132DS has a module efficiency of 22.95%, while Sunpro Power SP-96DSN455 is 22.77%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Sunpro Power SP620W-210R-132DS use vs Sunpro Power SP-96DSN455?
Sunpro Power SP620 W-210R-132DS uses HJT cells; Sunpro Power SP-96DSN455 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Sunpro Power SP620W-210R-132DS and Sunpro Power SP-96DSN455?
Sunpro Power SP620 W-210R-132DS has a 30 years power warranty; Sunpro Power SP-96DSN455 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Sunpro Power SP620W-210R-132DS and Sunpro Power SP-96DSN455 bifacial panels?
Both Sunpro Power SP620 W-210R-132DS and Sunpro Power SP-96DSN455 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 12 Sunpro Power offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.