Skip to main content
SP600W-210R-132DS vs SP630W-210R-132DS 13 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Sunpro Power SP600W-210R-132DS vs Sunpro Power SP630W-210R-132DS

Sunpro Power SP600W-210R-132DS
Sunpro Power
SP600W-210R-132DS
600 Wp 22.21 % HJT Bifacial
VS
Sunpro Power SP630W-210R-132DS
Sunpro Power
SP630W-210R-132DS
630 Wp 23.32 % HJT Bifacial
The verdict

SP630W-210R-132DS leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.11 pp more efficient. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 6 differences
How alike are they
13 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

6 of 19 parameters
Parameter SP600W-210R-132DS SP630W-210R-132DS Difference
Module efficiency 22.21 % 23.32 % 1.11 pp more efficient
Power density 222.1 Wp/m² 233.2 Wp/m² 11.1 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 600 Wp 630 Wp 30 W more power
Weight per kWp 54.3 kg/kWp 51.7 kg/kWp 2.6 kg/kWp lighter
Short-circuit current 15.56 A 16.16 A 0.60 A apart
Current at max power 14.76 A 15.30 A 0.54 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.240 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
SP600W-210R-132DS
20,444 kWh
SP630W-210R-132DS
21,467 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,023 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario SP600W-210R-132DS SP630W-210R-132DS
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 600 W 630 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.4% of rated power 578 W 607 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.8% of rated power 557 W 585 W
Hot roof 70 °C 89.2% of rated power 535 W 562 W
03

Full specification

Parameter SP600W-210R-132DS SP630W-210R-132DS Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 600 Wp 630 Wp +30 W for SP630W-210R-132DS
Module efficiency 22.21 % 23.32 % +1.11 pp for SP630W-210R-132DS
Power density 222.1 Wp/m² 233.2 Wp/m² +11.1 Wp/m² for SP630W-210R-132DS
Open-circuit voltage 48.75 V 49.34 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.69 V 41.23 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 15.56 A 16.16 A 0.60 A apart
Current at max power 14.76 A 15.30 A 0.54 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.240 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.701 m² 2.701 m² Same
Weight 32.6 kg 32.6 kg Same
Weight per kWp 54.3 kg/kWp 51.7 kg/kWp -2.6 kg/kWp for SP630W-210R-132DS
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr 0.30 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#5,754 vs #973
SP630W-210R-132DS leads by 4,781 places
Power density
#5,783 vs #1,003
SP630W-210R-132DS leads by 4,780 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #13
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,631 vs #5,108
SP630W-210R-132DS leads by 3,523 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,531 vs #1,630
SP630W-210R-132DS leads by 1,901 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SP600W-210R-132DS vs Sunpro Power SP620W-210R-132DS
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SP600W-210R-132DS vs Sunpro Power SP610W-210R-132DS
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SP600W-210R-132DS vs Sunpro Power SP-96DSB460
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SP600W-210R-132DS vs Sunpro Power SP-96DSN460
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SP600W-210R-132DS vs Sunpro Power SP-96DSB455
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SP600W-210R-132DS vs Sunpro Power SP-96DSN455
11 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Sunpro Power SP600W-210R-132DS or Sunpro Power SP630W-210R-132DS?
According to our database: Sunpro Power SP630 W-210R-132DS has higher module efficiency (23.32% vs 22.21%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Sunpro Power SP600W-210R-132DS and Sunpro Power SP630W-210R-132DS?
Sunpro Power SP600 W-210R-132DS has a module efficiency of 22.21%, while Sunpro Power SP630 W-210R-132DS is 23.32%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Sunpro Power SP600W-210R-132DS use vs Sunpro Power SP630W-210R-132DS?
Sunpro Power SP600 W-210R-132DS uses HJT cells; Sunpro Power SP630 W-210R-132DS uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Sunpro Power SP600W-210R-132DS and Sunpro Power SP630W-210R-132DS?
Sunpro Power SP600 W-210R-132DS has a 30 years power warranty; Sunpro Power SP630 W-210R-132DS has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Sunpro Power SP600W-210R-132DS and Sunpro Power SP630W-210R-132DS bifacial panels?
Both Sunpro Power SP600 W-210R-132DS and Sunpro Power SP630 W-210R-132DS are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 12 Sunpro Power offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.