Skip to main content
SP-96DSB460 vs SP610W-210R-132DS 8 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Sunpro Power SP-96DSB460 vs Sunpro Power SP610W-210R-132DS

Sunpro Power SP-96DSB460
Sunpro Power
SP-96DSB460
460 Wp 23.02 % HJT Bifacial
VS
Sunpro Power SP610W-210R-132DS
Sunpro Power
SP610W-210R-132DS
610 Wp 22.58 % HJT Bifacial
The verdict

SP-96DSB460 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 150 W more power. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
8 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

11 of 19 parameters
Parameter SP-96DSB460 SP610W-210R-132DS Difference
Rated power 460 Wp 610 Wp 150 W more power
Weight 23.0 kg 32.6 kg 9.6 kg lighter
Module efficiency 23.02 % 22.58 % 0.44 pp more efficient
Open-circuit voltage 36.93 V 48.94 V 12.01 V apart
Module area 1.998 m² 2.701 m² 0.703 m² apart
Annual degradation 0.38 %/yr 0.30 %/yr 0.08 %/yr slower
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 225.8 Wp/m² 4.4 Wp/m² higher
Weight per kWp 50.0 kg/kWp 53.4 kg/kWp 3.4 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power 31.05 V 40.85 V 9.80 V apart
Cell count 96 132 36 cells apart
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.240 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
SP-96DSB460
15,482 kWh
SP610W-210R-132DS
20,785 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,303 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario SP-96DSB460 SP610W-210R-132DS
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 460 W 610 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.4% of rated power 443 W 588 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.8% of rated power 427 W 566 W
Hot roof 70 °C 89.2% of rated power 410 W 544 W
03

Full specification

Parameter SP-96DSB460 SP610W-210R-132DS Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 460 Wp 610 Wp +150 W for SP610W-210R-132DS
Module efficiency 23.02 % 22.58 % +0.44 pp for SP-96DSB460
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 225.8 Wp/m² +4.4 Wp/m² for SP-96DSB460
Open-circuit voltage 36.93 V 48.94 V 12.01 V apart
Voltage at max power 31.05 V 40.85 V 9.80 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.52 A 15.76 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 14.82 A 14.95 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.240 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 2.701 m² 0.703 m² apart
Weight 23.0 kg 32.6 kg -9.6 kg for SP-96DSB460
Weight per kWp 50.0 kg/kWp 53.4 kg/kWp -3.4 kg/kWp for SP-96DSB460
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.38 %/yr 0.30 %/yr -0.08 %/yr for SP610W-210R-132DS
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 96 132 36 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,797 vs #3,828
SP-96DSB460 leads by 2,031 places
Power density
#1,876 vs #3,729
SP-96DSB460 leads by 1,853 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #13
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#3,317 vs #7,368
SP-96DSB460 leads by 4,051 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7,382 vs #2,712
SP610W-210R-132DS leads by 4,670 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SP-96DSB460 vs Sunpro Power SP630W-210R-132DS
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SP-96DSB460 vs Sunpro Power SP620W-210R-132DS
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SP-96DSB460 vs Sunpro Power SP600W-210R-132DS
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SP-96DSB460 vs Sunpro Power SP-96DSN460
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SP-96DSB460 vs Sunpro Power SP-96DSB455
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sunpro Power
Sunpro Power SP-96DSB460 vs Sunpro Power SP-96DSN455
One difference: module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Sunpro Power SP-96DSB460 or Sunpro Power SP610W-210R-132DS?
According to our database: Sunpro Power SP-96DSB460 has higher module efficiency (23.02% vs 22.58%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Sunpro Power SP-96DSB460 and Sunpro Power SP610W-210R-132DS?
Sunpro Power SP-96DSB460 has a module efficiency of 23.02%, while Sunpro Power SP610 W-210R-132DS is 22.58%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Sunpro Power SP-96DSB460 use vs Sunpro Power SP610W-210R-132DS?
Sunpro Power SP-96DSB460 uses HJT cells; Sunpro Power SP610 W-210R-132DS uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Sunpro Power SP-96DSB460 and Sunpro Power SP610W-210R-132DS?
Sunpro Power SP-96DSB460 has a 30 years power warranty; Sunpro Power SP610 W-210R-132DS has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Sunpro Power SP-96DSB460 and Sunpro Power SP610W-210R-132DS bifacial panels?
Both Sunpro Power SP-96DSB460 and Sunpro Power SP610 W-210R-132DS are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 12 Sunpro Power offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.