Skip to main content
400R-PM vs 420C-BD 3 of 16 identical Swap Change panels

Solaria Solaria PowerXT-400R-PM vs Solaria Solaria PowerXT-420C-BD

Solaria
Solaria PowerXT-400R-PM
400 Wp 20.20 %
VS
Solaria
Solaria PowerXT-420C-BD
420 Wp 19.40 % Incomplete
The verdict

400R-PM leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.80 pp more efficient. 3 of 16 comparable parameters are identical, with 3 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
3 of 16 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

13 of 16 parameters
Parameter 400R-PM 420C-BD Difference
Module efficiency 20.20 % 19.40 % 0.80 pp more efficient
Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs 5 yrs longer
Weight 21.0 kg 29.0 kg 8.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 52.5 kg/kWp 69.0 kg/kWp 16.5 kg/kWp lighter
Product warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs 5 yrs longer
Power density 202.1 Wp/m² 194.1 Wp/m² 8.0 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 400 Wp 420 Wp 20 W more power
Module area 1.979 m² 2.164 m² 0.185 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage 51.10 V 47.40 V 3.70 V apart
Short-circuit current 9.82 A 11.33 A 1.51 A apart
Voltage at max power 42.40 V 39.10 V 3.30 V apart
Current at max power 9.41 A 10.77 A 1.36 A apart
Dimensions 1644x1204x40 mm 1939x1116x40 mm 1644x1204x40 mm vs 1939x1116x40 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.390 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
400R-PM
13,421 kWh
420C-BD
14,092 kWh
Lifetime gap
671 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 400R-PM 420C-BD
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 400 W 420 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.2% of rated power 377 W 395 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 88.3% of rated power 353 W 371 W
Hot roof 70 °C 82.5% of rated power 330 W 346 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 400R-PM 420C-BD Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 400 Wp 420 Wp +20 W for 420C-BD
Module efficiency 20.20 % 19.40 % +0.80 pp for 400R-PM
Power density 202.1 Wp/m² 194.1 Wp/m² +8.0 Wp/m² for 400R-PM
Open-circuit voltage 51.10 V 47.40 V 3.70 V apart
Voltage at max power 42.40 V 39.10 V 3.30 V apart
Short-circuit current 9.82 A 11.33 A 1.51 A apart
Current at max power 9.41 A 10.77 A 1.36 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.390 %/°C -0.390 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1644x1204x40 mm 1939x1116x40 mm 1644x1204x40 mm vs 1939x1116x40 mm
Module area 1.979 m² 2.164 m² 0.185 m² apart
Weight 21.0 kg 29.0 kg -8.0 kg for 400R-PM
Weight per kWp 52.5 kg/kWp 69.0 kg/kWp -16.5 kg/kWp for 400R-PM
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs +5 yrs for 400R-PM
Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs +5 yrs for 400R-PM
Annual degradation 0.48 %/yr - Not published by Solaria
Technology
Cell technology - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#11,956 vs #12,735
400R-PM leads by 779 places
Power density
#11,987 vs #12,726
400R-PM leads by 739 places
Heat behaviour
#13,579 vs #13,579
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#6,043 vs #13,359
400R-PM leads by 7,316 places
Warranty
#21 vs #9,798
400R-PM leads by 9,777 places
Overall
#9,549 vs #11,183
400R-PM leads by 1,634 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria Solaria PowerXT-400R-PM vs Solaria PowerXT 430R-PL
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria Solaria PowerXT-400R-PM vs Solaria Solaria PowerXT-430C-PD
13 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria Solaria PowerXT-400R-PM vs Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria Solaria PowerXT-400R-PM vs Solaria Solaria PowerXT-420C-PD
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria Solaria PowerXT-400R-PM vs Solaria Solaria PowerXT-410C-BD
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria Solaria PowerXT-400R-PM vs Solaria Solaria PowerX-400R
12 differences, the largest is performance warranty
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Solaria Solaria PowerXT-400R-PM or Solaria Solaria PowerXT-420C-BD?
According to our database: Solaria Solaria PowerXT-400R-PM has higher module efficiency (20.20% vs 19.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Solaria Solaria PowerXT-400R-PM and Solaria Solaria PowerXT-420C-BD?
Solaria Solaria PowerXT-400R-PM has a module efficiency of 20.20%, while Solaria Solaria PowerXT-420C-BD is 19.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Solaria Solaria PowerXT-400R-PM use vs Solaria Solaria PowerXT-420C-BD?
Solaria Solaria PowerXT-400R-PM uses Monocrystalline cells; Solaria Solaria PowerXT-420C-BD uses Monocrystalline. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Solaria Solaria PowerXT-400R-PM and Solaria Solaria PowerXT-420C-BD?
Solaria Solaria PowerXT-400R-PM has a 30 years power warranty; Solaria Solaria PowerXT-420C-BD has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 1 Solaria offer

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.