Skip to main content
Solaria PowerX-400R vs PowerXT 420R-PL 4 of 17 identical Swap Change panels

Solaria Solaria PowerX-400R vs Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL

Solaria
Solaria PowerX-400R
400 Wp 20.50 %
VS
Solaria
PowerXT 420R-PL
420 Wp 19.90 %
The verdict

13 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is performance warranty: 5 yrs longer. 4 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
4 of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

13 of 17 parameters
Parameter Solaria PowerX-400R PowerXT 420R-PL Difference
Performance warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs 5 yrs longer
Module efficiency 20.50 % 19.90 % 0.60 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.360 %/°C -0.390 %/°C 0.030 %/°C better in heat
Product warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs 5 yrs longer
Rated power 400 Wp 420 Wp 20 W more power
Open-circuit voltage 37.30 V 45.70 V 8.40 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.68 A 11.60 A 2.08 A apart
Module area 1.954 m² 2.112 m² 0.158 m² apart
Power density 204.7 Wp/m² 198.9 Wp/m² 5.8 Wp/m² higher
Weight per kWp 55.2 kg/kWp 51.7 kg/kWp 3.6 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power 31.00 V 37.90 V 6.90 V apart
Current at max power 12.90 A 11.09 A 1.81 A apart
Dimensions 1723x1134x35 mm 1957x1079x35 mm 1723x1134x35 mm vs 1957x1079x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Solaria PowerX-400R
13,068 kWh
PowerXT 420R-PL
13,765 kWh
Lifetime gap
697 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario Solaria PowerX-400R PowerXT 420R-PL
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 400 W 420 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.2% of rated power 378 W 395 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 88.3% of rated power 357 W 371 W
Hot roof 70 °C 82.5% of rated power 335 W 346 W
03

Full specification

Parameter Solaria PowerX-400R PowerXT 420R-PL Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 400 Wp 420 Wp +20 W for PowerXT 420R-PL
Module efficiency 20.50 % 19.90 % +0.60 pp for Solaria PowerX-400R
Power density 204.7 Wp/m² 198.9 Wp/m² +5.8 Wp/m² for Solaria PowerX-400R
Open-circuit voltage 37.30 V 45.70 V 8.40 V apart
Voltage at max power 31.00 V 37.90 V 6.90 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.68 A 11.60 A 2.08 A apart
Current at max power 12.90 A 11.09 A 1.81 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.360 %/°C -0.390 %/°C +0.030 %/°C for Solaria PowerX-400R
Mechanical
Dimensions 1723x1134x35 mm 1957x1079x35 mm 1723x1134x35 mm vs 1957x1079x35 mm
Module area 1.954 m² 2.112 m² 0.158 m² apart
Weight 22.1 kg 21.7 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 55.2 kg/kWp 51.7 kg/kWp -3.6 kg/kWp for PowerXT 420R-PL
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs +5 yrs for PowerXT 420R-PL
Performance warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs +5 yrs for PowerXT 420R-PL
Annual degradation 0.50 %/yr 0.48 %/yr Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#11,308 vs #12,331
Solaria PowerX-400R leads by 1,023 places
Power density
#11,499 vs #12,344
Solaria PowerX-400R leads by 845 places
Heat behaviour
#12,345 vs #13,579
Solaria PowerX-400R leads by 1,234 places
Weight
#9,691 vs #5,023
PowerXT 420R-PL leads by 4,668 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #21
PowerXT 420R-PL leads by 9,777 places
Overall
#10,732 vs #9,324
PowerXT 420R-PL leads by 1,408 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria Solaria PowerX-400R vs Solaria Solaria PowerX-395R
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria Solaria PowerX-400R vs Solaria Solaria PowerX-390R
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL vs Solaria PowerXT 430R-PL
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL vs Solaria Solaria PowerXT-430C-PD
9 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL vs Solaria Solaria PowerXT-420C-BD
10 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL vs Solaria Solaria PowerXT-420C-PD
9 differences, the largest is performance warranty
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Solaria Solaria PowerX-400R or Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL?
According to our database: Solaria Solaria PowerX-400R has higher module efficiency (20.50% vs 19.90%); Solaria Solaria PowerX-400R tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.360%/°C vs -0.390%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Solaria Solaria PowerX-400R and Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL?
Solaria Solaria PowerX-400R has a module efficiency of 20.50%, while Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL is 19.90%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Solaria Solaria PowerX-400R use vs Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL?
Solaria Solaria PowerX-400R uses Monocrystalline cells; Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL uses Monocrystalline. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Solaria Solaria PowerX-400R and Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL?
Solaria Solaria PowerX-400R has a 25 years power warranty; Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 1 Solaria offer

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.