Skip to main content
715-BTC-BG vs 730-BHC-BG 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG vs Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG

Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG
SRP-715-BTC-BG
715 Wp 23.02 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG
SRP-730-BHC-BG
730 Wp 23.50 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

730-BHC-BG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.032 %/°C better in heat. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter 715-BTC-BG 730-BHC-BG Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.258 %/°C 0.032 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency 23.02 % 23.50 % 0.48 pp more efficient
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.30 %/yr 0.10 %/yr slower
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² 4.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 715 Wp 730 Wp 15 W more power
Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT
Open-circuit voltage 49.10 V 51.12 V 2.02 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.44 A 17.80 A 0.64 A apart
Voltage at max power 41.13 V 43.10 V 1.97 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
715-BTC-BG
23,990 kWh
730-BHC-BG
24,874 kWh
Lifetime gap
884 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 715-BTC-BG 730-BHC-BG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 715 W 730 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 684 W 702 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 653 W 673 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 622 W 645 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 715-BTC-BG 730-BHC-BG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 715 Wp 730 Wp +15 W for 730-BHC-BG
Module efficiency 23.02 % 23.50 % +0.48 pp for 730-BHC-BG
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² +4.8 Wp/m² for 730-BHC-BG
Open-circuit voltage 49.10 V 51.12 V 2.02 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.13 V 43.10 V 1.97 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.44 A 17.80 A 0.64 A apart
Current at max power 17.39 A 17.00 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.258 %/°C +0.032 %/°C for 730-BHC-BG
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.5 kg 38.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 53.8 kg/kWp 52.7 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.30 %/yr -0.10 %/yr for 730-BHC-BG
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,797 vs #716
730-BHC-BG leads by 1,081 places
Power density
#2,018 vs #800
730-BHC-BG leads by 1,218 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #466
730-BHC-BG leads by 1,699 places
Weight
#7,897 vs #6,396
730-BHC-BG leads by 1,501 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#471 vs #208
730-BHC-BG leads by 263 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG vs Seraphim SRP-720-BTC-BG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG vs Seraphim SRP-710-BTC-BG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG vs Seraphim SRP-705-BTC-BG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG vs Seraphim SRP-700-BTC-BG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG vs Seraphim SRP-695-BTC-BG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG vs Seraphim SRP-690-BTC-BG
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG or Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG?
According to our database: Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 23.02%); Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.258%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG and Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG?
Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG has a module efficiency of 23.02%, while Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG use vs Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG?
Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG uses TOPCon cells; Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG and Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG?
Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG has a 30 years power warranty; Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG and Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG bifacial panels?
Both Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG and Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 Seraphim offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.