Skip to main content
RS9H-M TOPCON-720 vs RS8V-M-430W FULL BLACK 5 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720 vs Resun Solar RS8V-M-430W FULL BLACK

Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720
Resun Solar
RS9H-M TOPCON-720
720 Wp 23.18 % TOPCon
VS
Resun Solar
RS8V-M-430W FULL BLACK
430 Wp 22.02 % TOPCon
The verdict

14 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is module efficiency: 1.16 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 14 differences
How alike are they
5 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

14 of 19 parameters
Parameter RS9H-M TOPCON-720 RS8V-M-430W FULL BLACK Difference
Module efficiency 23.18 % 22.02 % 1.16 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.250 %/°C 0.050 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 720 Wp 430 Wp 290 W more power
Power density 231.8 Wp/m² 220.2 Wp/m² 11.6 Wp/m² higher
Weight 32.3 kg 21.5 kg 10.8 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 49.40 V 37.84 V 11.56 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.49 A 14.27 A 4.22 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 1.953 m² 1.154 m² apart
Annual degradation 0.50 %/yr 0.40 %/yr 0.10 %/yr slower
Weight per kWp 44.9 kg/kWp 50.0 kg/kWp 5.1 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power 41.30 V 32.09 V 9.21 V apart
Current at max power 17.44 A 13.40 A 4.04 A apart
Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
RS9H-M TOPCON-720
23,782 kWh
RS8V-M-430W FULL BLACK
14,427 kWh
Lifetime gap
9,355 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario RS9H-M TOPCON-720 RS8V-M-430W FULL BLACK
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 720 W 430 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 688 W 414 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 655 W 398 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 623 W 382 W
03

Full specification

Parameter RS9H-M TOPCON-720 RS8V-M-430W FULL BLACK Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 720 Wp 430 Wp +290 W for RS9H-M TOPCON-720
Module efficiency 23.18 % 22.02 % +1.16 pp for RS9H-M TOPCON-720
Power density 231.8 Wp/m² 220.2 Wp/m² +11.6 Wp/m² for RS9H-M TOPCON-720
Open-circuit voltage 49.40 V 37.84 V 11.56 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.30 V 32.09 V 9.21 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.49 A 14.27 A 4.22 A apart
Current at max power 17.44 A 13.40 A 4.04 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.250 %/°C +0.050 %/°C for RS8V-M-430W FULL BLACK
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 1.953 m² 1.154 m² apart
Weight 32.3 kg 21.5 kg -10.8 kg for RS8V-M-430W FULL BLACK
Weight per kWp 44.9 kg/kWp 50.0 kg/kWp -5.1 kg/kWp for RS9H-M TOPCON-720
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.50 %/yr 0.40 %/yr -0.10 %/yr for RS8V-M-430W FULL BLACK
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,424 vs #6,329
RS9H-M TOPCON-720 leads by 4,905 places
Power density
#1,347 vs #6,481
RS9H-M TOPCON-720 leads by 5,134 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #456
RS8V-M-430W FULL BLACK leads by 5,637 places
Weight
#559 vs #3,317
RS9H-M TOPCON-720 leads by 2,758 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#325 vs #9,520
RS9H-M TOPCON-720 leads by 9,195 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-735
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-730
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-725
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M-720
One difference: dimensions
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M-DG-720
4 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M-715
One difference: dimensions
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720 or Resun Solar RS8V-M-430W FULL BLACK?
According to our database: Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720 has higher module efficiency (23.18% vs 22.02%); Resun Solar RS8V-M-430 W FULL BLACK tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.250%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720 and Resun Solar RS8V-M-430W FULL BLACK?
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720 has a module efficiency of 23.18%, while Resun Solar RS8V-M-430 W FULL BLACK is 22.02%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720 use vs Resun Solar RS8V-M-430W FULL BLACK?
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720 uses TOPCon cells; Resun Solar RS8V-M-430 W FULL BLACK uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720 and Resun Solar RS8V-M-430W FULL BLACK?
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720 has a 30 years power warranty; Resun Solar RS8V-M-430 W FULL BLACK has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.