Skip to main content
RS9-715NBG-E1 vs YH200W-19.5M 3 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 vs Renesola YH200W-19.5M

Renesola
RS9-715NBG-E1
715 Wp 23.02 % N-type Bifacial
VS
Renesola
YH200W-19.5M
200 Wp 20.16 % TOPCon Incomplete
The verdict

RS9-715NBG-E1 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 2.86 pp more efficient. 3 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 15 differences
How alike are they
3 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

15 of 18 parameters
Parameter RS9-715NBG-E1 YH200W-19.5M Difference
Module efficiency 23.02 % 20.16 % 2.86 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.340 %/°C 0.050 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 715 Wp 200 Wp 515 W more power
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 201.6 Wp/m² 28.6 Wp/m² higher
Weight 38.7 kg 10.5 kg 28.2 kg lighter
Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs 15 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage 49.20 V 26.01 V 23.19 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.44 A 9.41 A 9.03 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 0.992 m² 2.114 m² apart
Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon
Voltage at max power 41.10 V 22.45 V 18.65 V apart
Current at max power 17.40 A 8.91 A 8.49 A apart
Cell count 132 39 93 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1485x668x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1485x668x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
RS9-715NBG-E1
23,990 kWh
YH200W-19.5M
6,710 kWh
Lifetime gap
17,280 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario RS9-715NBG-E1 YH200W-19.5M
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 715 W 200 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 684 W 190 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 653 W 180 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 622 W 169 W
03

Full specification

Parameter RS9-715NBG-E1 YH200W-19.5M Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 715 Wp 200 Wp +515 W for RS9-715NBG-E1
Module efficiency 23.02 % 20.16 % +2.86 pp for RS9-715NBG-E1
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 201.6 Wp/m² +28.6 Wp/m² for RS9-715NBG-E1
Open-circuit voltage 49.20 V 26.01 V 23.19 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.10 V 22.45 V 18.65 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.44 A 9.41 A 9.03 A apart
Current at max power 17.40 A 8.91 A 8.49 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.340 %/°C +0.050 %/°C for RS9-715NBG-E1
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1485x668x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1485x668x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 0.992 m² 2.114 m² apart
Weight 38.7 kg 10.5 kg -28.2 kg for YH200W-19.5M
Weight per kWp 54.1 kg/kWp 52.5 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs +15 yrs for YH200W-19.5M
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr - Not published by Renesola
Technology
Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 39 93 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,797 vs #12,067
RS9-715NBG-E1 leads by 10,270 places
Power density
#2,018 vs #12,024
RS9-715NBG-E1 leads by 10,006 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #8,778
RS9-715NBG-E1 leads by 6,613 places
Weight
#8,339 vs #6,043
YH200W-19.5M leads by 2,296 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#471 vs #12,613
RS9-715NBG-E1 leads by 12,142 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 vs Renesola RS9-720NBG-E1
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 vs Renesola RS9-710NBG-E1
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 vs Renesola RS9-705NBG-E1
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 vs Renesola RS9-700NBG-E1
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola YH200W-19.5M vs Renesola YH190W-19.5M
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola YH200W-19.5M vs Renesola YH180W-19.5M
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 or Renesola YH200W-19.5M?
According to our database: Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 has higher module efficiency (23.02% vs 20.16%); Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 and Renesola YH200W-19.5M?
Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 has a module efficiency of 23.02%, while Renesola YH200 W-19.5M is 20.16%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 use vs Renesola YH200W-19.5M?
Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 uses N-type cells; Renesola YH200 W-19.5M uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 and Renesola YH200W-19.5M?
Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 has a 30 years power warranty; Renesola YH200 W-19.5M has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 and Renesola YH200W-19.5M bifacial panels?
Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Renesola YH200 W-19.5M is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 1 Renesola offer

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.