Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 vs Renesola YH180W-19.5M
VS
The verdict
RS9-715NBG-E1 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 4.87 pp more efficient. 2 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 16 differencesHow alike are they
2
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
16 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
RS9-715NBG-E1
YH180W-19.5M
Difference
Module efficiency
23.02 %
18.15 %
4.87 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
0.050 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
715 Wp
180 Wp
535 W more power
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
181.5 Wp/m²
48.7 Wp/m² higher
Weight
38.7 kg
10.5 kg
28.2 kg lighter
Product warranty
15 yrs
30 yrs
15 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
49.20 V
24.37 V
24.83 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.44 A
8.72 A
9.72 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
0.992 m²
2.114 m² apart
Weight per kWp
54.1 kg/kWp
58.3 kg/kWp
4.2 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Voltage at max power
41.10 V
21.79 V
19.31 V apart
Current at max power
17.40 A
8.27 A
9.13 A apart
Cell count
132
39
93 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1485x668x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1485x668x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
RS9-715NBG-E1
23,990 kWh
YH180W-19.5M
6,039 kWh
Lifetime gap
17,951 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
RS9-715NBG-E1
YH180W-19.5M
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
715 W
180 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
684 W
171 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
653 W
162 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
622 W
152 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
RS9-715NBG-E1
YH180W-19.5M
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
715 Wp
180 Wp
+535 W for RS9-715NBG-E1
Module efficiency
23.02 %
18.15 %
+4.87 pp for RS9-715NBG-E1
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
181.5 Wp/m²
+48.7 Wp/m² for RS9-715NBG-E1
Open-circuit voltage
49.20 V
24.37 V
24.83 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.10 V
21.79 V
19.31 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.44 A
8.72 A
9.72 A apart
Current at max power
17.40 A
8.27 A
9.13 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
+0.050 %/°C for RS9-715NBG-E1
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1485x668x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1485x668x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
0.992 m²
2.114 m² apart
Weight
38.7 kg
10.5 kg
-28.2 kg for YH180W-19.5M
Weight per kWp
54.1 kg/kWp
58.3 kg/kWp
-4.2 kg/kWp for RS9-715NBG-E1
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
30 yrs
+15 yrs for YH180W-19.5M
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
-
Not published by Renesola
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
39
93 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,797
vs
#13,197
RS9-715NBG-E1 leads by 11,400 places
Power density
#2,018
vs
#13,175
RS9-715NBG-E1 leads by 11,157 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#8,778
RS9-715NBG-E1 leads by 6,613 places
Weight
#8,339
vs
#11,670
RS9-715NBG-E1 leads by 3,331 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#471
vs
#13,158
RS9-715NBG-E1 leads by 12,687 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 vs Renesola RS9-720NBG-E1
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 vs Renesola RS9-710NBG-E1
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 vs Renesola RS9-705NBG-E1
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 vs Renesola RS9-700NBG-E1
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola YH180W-19.5M vs Renesola YH200W-19.5M
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola YH180W-19.5M vs Renesola YH190W-19.5M
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 or Renesola YH180W-19.5M?
According to our database: Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 has higher module efficiency (23.02% vs 18.15%); Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 and Renesola YH180W-19.5M?
Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 has a module efficiency of 23.02%, while Renesola YH180 W-19.5M is 18.15%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 use vs Renesola YH180W-19.5M?
Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 uses N-type cells; Renesola YH180 W-19.5M uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 and Renesola YH180W-19.5M?
Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 has a 30 years power warranty; Renesola YH180 W-19.5M has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 and Renesola YH180W-19.5M bifacial panels?
Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Renesola YH180 W-19.5M is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 1 Renesola offer
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.