Skip to main content
RCM-725-8DBNM vs CME-132BDS-720 18 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Recom RCM-725-8DBNM vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720

Recom RCM-725-8DBNM
Recom
RCM-725-8DBNM
725 Wp 23.30 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
CME-132BDS-720
720 Wp 23.21 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

One difference, none of them an advantage

The largest is dimensions: 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm. 18 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See the one difference
How alike are they
18 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

1 of 19 parameters
Parameter RCM-725-8DBNM CME-132BDS-720 Difference
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2383x1302x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
RCM-725-8DBNM
24,325 kWh
CME-132BDS-720
24,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario RCM-725-8DBNM CME-132BDS-720
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 725 W 720 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 693 W 689 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 662 W 657 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 630 W 626 W
03

Full specification

Parameter RCM-725-8DBNM CME-132BDS-720 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 725 Wp 720 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 23.30 % 23.21 % Effectively the same
Power density 233.4 Wp/m² 232.1 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.41 V 49.10 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.27 V 41.30 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.64 A 18.43 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.57 A 17.43 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2383x1302x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.103 m² Effectively the same
Weight 37.8 kg 37.0 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 52.1 kg/kWp 51.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,017 vs #1,299
RCM-725-8DBNM leads by 282 places
Power density
#936 vs #1,339
RCM-725-8DBNM leads by 403 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,609 vs #4,775
CME-132BDS-720 leads by 834 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#14 vs #22
RCM-725-8DBNM leads by 8 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-725-8DBNM vs Recom RCM-730-8DBNM
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-725-8DBNM vs Recom RCM-720-8DBNM
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-725-8DBNM vs Recom RCM-715-8DBNM
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-725-8DBNM vs Recom RCM-715-8NM
8 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-725-8DBNM vs Recom RCM-710-8DBNM
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-725-8DBNM vs Recom RCM-710-8NM
8 differences, the largest is weight
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Recom RCM-725-8DBNM or AE Solar CME-132BDS-720?
According to our database: Recom RCM-725-8DBNM has higher module efficiency (23.30% vs 23.21%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Recom RCM-725-8DBNM and AE Solar CME-132BDS-720?
Recom RCM-725-8DBNM has a module efficiency of 23.30%, while AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 is 23.21%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Recom RCM-725-8DBNM use vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720?
Recom RCM-725-8DBNM uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Recom RCM-725-8DBNM and AE Solar CME-132BDS-720?
Recom RCM-725-8DBNM has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Recom RCM-725-8DBNM and AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 bifacial panels?
Both Recom RCM-725-8DBNM and AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Compare Recom and AE Solar as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 3 Recom offers · See 5 AE Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.