Skip to main content
460-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) 18 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Recom RCM-460-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)

Recom RCM-460-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
Recom
RCM-460-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
460 Wp 23.02 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
Recom
RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
465 Wp 23.27 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.25 pp more efficient. 18 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See the one difference
How alike are they
18 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

1 of 19 parameters
Parameter 460-RDBNAA (Lynx series) 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) Difference
Module efficiency 23.02 % 23.27 % 0.25 pp more efficient
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
460-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
15,434 kWh
465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
15,602 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 460-RDBNAA (Lynx series) 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 460 W 465 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 441 W 445 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 421 W 426 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 402 W 406 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 460-RDBNAA (Lynx series) 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 460 Wp 465 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 23.02 % 23.27 % +0.25 pp for 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 232.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 35.90 V 36.10 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 30.20 V 30.40 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 16.17 A 16.24 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 15.24 A 15.30 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.998 m² 1.998 m² Same
Weight 25.0 kg 25.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 54.3 kg/kWp 53.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 192 192 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,797 vs #1,202
465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) leads by 595 places
Power density
#1,876 vs #1,115
465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) leads by 761 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,637 vs #7,824
465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) leads by 813 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,320 vs #3,845
465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) leads by 475 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-460-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-730-8DBNM
13 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-460-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-725-8DBNM
13 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-460-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-720-8DBNM
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-460-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-715-8DBNM
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-460-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-715-8NM
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-460-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-710-8DBNM
10 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Recom RCM-460-RDBNAA (Lynx series) or Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)?
According to our database: Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) has higher module efficiency (23.27% vs 23.02%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Recom RCM-460-RDBNAA (Lynx series) and Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)?
Recom RCM-460-RDBNAA (Lynx series) has a module efficiency of 23.02%, while Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) is 23.27%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Recom RCM-460-RDBNAA (Lynx series) use vs Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)?
Recom RCM-460-RDBNAA (Lynx series) uses TOPCon cells; Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Recom RCM-460-RDBNAA (Lynx series) and Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)?
Recom RCM-460-RDBNAA (Lynx series) has a 30 years power warranty; Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Recom RCM-460-RDBNAA (Lynx series) and Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) bifacial panels?
Both Recom RCM-460-RDBNAA (Lynx series) and Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 3 Recom offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.