Skip to main content
PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 vs TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630 11 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630

Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605
Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605
605 Wp 21.70 % PERC Bifacial
VS
Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630
Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630
630 Wp 22.60 % N-type Bifacial
The verdict

TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.90 pp more efficient. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 8 differences
How alike are they
11 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

8 of 19 parameters
Parameter PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630 Difference
Module efficiency 21.70 % 22.60 % 0.90 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.300 %/°C 0.040 %/°C better in heat
Power density 216.7 Wp/m² 225.7 Wp/m² 9.0 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 605 Wp 630 Wp 25 W more power
Annual degradation 0.45 %/yr 0.33 %/yr 0.12 %/yr slower
Open-circuit voltage 53.69 V 57.23 V 3.54 V apart
Cell technology PERC N-type PERC vs N-type
Voltage at max power 45.40 V 47.89 V 2.49 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605
19,923 kWh
TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630
21,255 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,332 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 605 W 630 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 574 W 602 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 543 W 573 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 512 W 545 W
03

Full specification

Parameter PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 605 Wp 630 Wp +25 W for TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630
Module efficiency 21.70 % 22.60 % +0.90 pp for TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630
Power density 216.7 Wp/m² 225.7 Wp/m² +9.0 Wp/m² for TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630
Open-circuit voltage 53.69 V 57.23 V 3.54 V apart
Voltage at max power 45.40 V 47.89 V 2.49 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.90 A 13.88 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.33 A 13.15 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.300 %/°C +0.040 %/°C for TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630
Mechanical
Dimensions 2462x1134x35 mm 2462x1134x35 mm Same
Module area 2.792 m² 2.792 m² Same
Weight 34.9 kg 35.4 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 57.7 kg/kWp 56.2 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.45 %/yr 0.33 %/yr -0.12 %/yr for TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630
Technology
Cell technology PERC N-type PERC vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 156 156 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#7,421 vs #3,658
TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630 leads by 3,763 places
Power density
#7,537 vs #3,860
TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630 leads by 3,677 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778 vs #6,093
TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630 leads by 2,685 places
Weight
#11,362 vs #10,482
TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630 leads by 880 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,578 vs #2,631
TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630 leads by 1,947 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 590
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 590
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 or Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630?
According to our database: Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630 has higher module efficiency (22.60% vs 21.70%); Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 and Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630?
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 has a module efficiency of 21.70%, while Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630 is 22.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 use vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630?
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 uses PERC cells; Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 and Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630?
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 has a 30 years power warranty; Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 and Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630 bifacial panels?
Both Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 and Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 25 Q-Cells offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.